Will Give Medal!!!!
4. Fiber-optic cables are used widely for Internet wiring, data transmission, and surgeries. When light passes through a fiber-optic cable, its intensity decreases with the increase in the length of the cable. If 1,500 lumens of light enter the cable, the intensity of light decreases by 3.4% per meter of cable. Part A: Can this situation be represented by a linear function? Justify your answer. (2 points) Part B: Write a function f(x) to represent the intensity of light, in lumens, when it has passed through x meters of the cable. (4 points) Part C: Some scientists are trying to make a cable for which the intensity of light would decrease by 5 lumens per unit length of the cable. Can this situation be represented by a linear function? Justify your answer and write the appropriate function to represent this situation if 1500 lumens of light enter the cable. (4 points) Part A: Can this situation be linear? Why or why not? Part B: Write the function: f(x) = Part C: Some scientists are trying to make a cable for which the intensity of light would decrease by 5 lumens per unit length of the cable. Is this a linear function? Why or why not? Write the function: f(x) =
for
These are the ones im supposed to do btw: Part A: Can this situation be linear? Why or why not? Part B: Write the function: f(x) = Part C: Some scientists are trying to make a cable for which the intensity of light would decrease by 5 lumens per unit length of the cable. Is this a linear function? Why or why not? Write the function: f(x) =
@mathmath333
love your pic btw
haha I like yours too @mclover1477
phanks
and i spelt it like that on purpose
yeah I know!
@mathmate
It's long. Looks like it takes me days to read the question, but I'll try!
thank you!
Yes, it is very informative, so I didn't waste my investment in time. Now your turn, let's do it one by one. What is your proposed answer for A? (The more you explain, the more help you get!)
I think that it cant be linear. its just a guess
Not good if it is a guess! lol But you're right. Let me try to explain: The change per metre (sorry, I'm used to this spelling) is what?
the change per meter is the intensity of light right?
Yes, what is the change in intensity per metre?
3.4%
Excellent! If we started with 1500 lumens, how much light is dissipated (lost) in the first metre?
do I have to subtract 3.4% to 1500?
Yes, take off 3.4% of 1500=51 lumens, right?
yes
We that leaves us with 1500-51=1449 lumens at the beginning of the second metre. ok so far?
yup
How many lumens will be lost in the second metre?
is it 1448
Not exactly, you just subtracted 1 lumen from 1449, but we need to subtract 3.4% of 1449, so what is lost in the second metre is 1449*3.4%=49.3 lumens.
oh ok
Now here's the key question: Can a linear function have a different "rate of change" at each metre?
I don't think so
There you go: we have just demonstrated that the rate of change is not constant, so the conclusion is:________________________
this situation cannot be linear because in the first meter 1448 lumens are lost and in the second meter 49.3 lumens are lost therefore linear functions cannot have a different rate of change at each meter
Excellent! So we finished part A, right?
Except the first metre only lost 51 lumens....:(
ok ill change that and yes that was part A can we go to part b?
If we lose 3.4% each metre, how much (in percent) do we have left at the beginning of the next metre?
is it 47.6
I think you mean (100-3.4)=96.6%! :)
and 96.6% can be written as 0.966, do you agree?
oh ok haha :3
So light will decrease from 1500 lumens, decrease to 0.966 of the previous value for every metre it goes through. Can you tell me what kind of function can model kind of behaviour?
I have no idea on this one o.O
|dw:1420671734360:dw| Does this ring a bell?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!