ODE clarification, Canonical form: Given \(2y'+siny'=x+y^2~~~and~~~y(0)=0\) Find the canonical form.
So I got \[y''=\frac{1+2yy'}{2+cosy'}\] as the canonical form. What am I supposed to do with the y(0)=0? My teacher put "\(2y'(0)+siny'(0)=0+y^2(0)\Rightarrow y'(0)=0\)" on the board
@vishweshshrimali5 , any good with this, It's not in my book, so I am jsut not sure on the procedure
I just don't see how he solved that for y', like clearly zero works, but is it the only possible solution?
Basically he used y'(0) for finding out the exact value of the integration constant C
there is no integration constant
no integration going on here
See, whenever you solve a differential equation you basically just integrate it. This integration results in integration constant. A simple differential equation has infinite solutions but one with an initial value has only one solution - because C has been specified
but this is not solving, it is canonical form
Canonical form is prior to any integration
I am not much familiar with canonical form... sorry :( But, @Kainui and @ganeshie8 can help you out... Again sorry
it's cool, I'm just wondering if it was a guess, the real issue is the algebra here: \(2y′(0)+siny′(0)=0+y2(0)⇒y′(0)=0\) He had to solve for y'(0), but how do you solve 2y'+siny'=0?
non-linear odes are not nice
u have to linearize this first
No, you don't. I'm not solving it. It's just the canonical form
ie get the highest derivative by itself on the left, and that's it. He added this bound like thing and never explained it
@Kainui
if you want my work for canonical, I can type that up
Yeah that's exactly what I was gonna ask for haha. Show me your work and we'll see what we can figure out from there, I have some ideas.
ok so like I said before, my final answer is up top, but her is the work for that: \[2y'+siny'=x+y^2\]\[[2y'+siny']'=[x+y^2]'\]\[2y''+y''cosy'=1+2yy'\]\[y''[2+cosy']=1+2yy'\]\[y''=\frac{1+2yy'}{2+cosy'}\]
now he did this problem on the board, he then wrote what I quoted above and said the final answer was what I have + y(0)=0 and y'(0)=0
So it was given that y(0)=0 but then showed that y'(0)=0 too? Or was that also given
but the issue I really am having is how (other than guessing) he determined that y'(0)=0
nope, showed that y'(0)=0
he just plugged and chugged into the original given eq
This isn't in the book, so I have no reference
The way I did it is weird, so I'm trying to find a better method one sec.
ok
Oh I see! Haha it's kinda fun. Ok check it out, take the original equation and plug in y(0)=0
right, I get 2y'+siny'=0
but I'm missing why x=0 is given
So now solve for y' in terms of itself we get: \[\Large y'(0)=- \frac{1}{2} \sin( y'(0))\] Here we can ask ourselves, sine of what number times a constant is equal to itself?
ohhhhh nice
ok that makes sense now
You can draw this as a graph if it is not clear and it will make it immediately apparent, look where y=x and y=-1/2sin(x) intersect.
right right, you're right
ok, he just didn't explain that reasoning on a new topic....
what's the phrase, couldn't see the trees for the forest? I think
Thanks
Yeah the original way I did it was ridiculous, I just took this limit by plugging itself in infinitely to itself haha. \[\Large y' = - \frac{1}{2} \sin ( - \frac{1}{2} \sin ( - \frac{1}{2} \sin (...)))\]
yea, that may be a bit much lol
But since we have the easy way I just thought for laughs I'd share XD
:) thanks laughs are always a good thing.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!