Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 14 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

help? write an indirect proof to show that opposite angles of a parallelogram are congruent.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@perl are you going to help me?

OpenStudy (perl):

we want to prove that

OpenStudy (perl):

my draw button keeps dying, one moment

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay

OpenStudy (perl):

|dw:1421740225264:dw|

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@perl but how do I put that information into a sentence?

OpenStudy (perl):

we want to prove that <A = <C and <B = <D Assume the opposite, that at least one of those two pairs of angles are not congruent. So without loss of information we can assume that <A not equal to <C. AB is a transverse to AD and BC <A+<B=180 degrees (consecutive angles with parallel lines) BC is a transverse to AB and CD <B+<C=180 degrees <A+<B=<B+<C <A=<C (subtraction of equal numbers) But we assumed <A is not equal to <C. contradiction!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks can you help me with another one? please @perl

OpenStudy (perl):

ok

OpenStudy (anonymous):

square RSTU is constructed with line PQ drawn through its center. if the square is dilated using a scale factor of 1/2 and a line is drawn thought the center of the new dilated figure,what relationship will the new line have with line PQ? explain your reasoning. @perl

OpenStudy (perl):

do you have a diagram of this

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no that's the whole question

OpenStudy (perl):

|dw:1421741156408:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!