help? write an indirect proof to show that opposite angles of a parallelogram are congruent.
@perl are you going to help me?
we want to prove that
my draw button keeps dying, one moment
okay
|dw:1421740225264:dw|
@perl but how do I put that information into a sentence?
we want to prove that <A = <C and <B = <D Assume the opposite, that at least one of those two pairs of angles are not congruent. So without loss of information we can assume that <A not equal to <C. AB is a transverse to AD and BC <A+<B=180 degrees (consecutive angles with parallel lines) BC is a transverse to AB and CD <B+<C=180 degrees <A+<B=<B+<C <A=<C (subtraction of equal numbers) But we assumed <A is not equal to <C. contradiction!
thanks can you help me with another one? please @perl
ok
square RSTU is constructed with line PQ drawn through its center. if the square is dilated using a scale factor of 1/2 and a line is drawn thought the center of the new dilated figure,what relationship will the new line have with line PQ? explain your reasoning. @perl
do you have a diagram of this
no that's the whole question
|dw:1421741156408:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!