Show that the ring M of n x n matrices over Real has no ideals other than 0 and M Please, help
I have a guidance but don't get. Let me post
Let's suppose that \(I\neq0\) is an ideal other than \(M\).
Let do the smallest case first as guidance said to easily follow, please
Now let's consider the basis \(\{E_{i,j}\}\) as given in the hint ---this is the cannonical basis of \(\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}\). Which means that given any matrix A we can find \(\alpha_{i,j}\) such that \[ A=\sum_{i,j}\alpha_{i,j}E_{i,j}. \] Actually \(\alpha_{i,j}\) are the entries of A. All right this far?
yes
the most prosaic way to think about this is if your matrix has one non zero element, then you can multiply it by something to put a non zero element in any entry since the ideal swallows up the product under multiplication, the idea must the the entire matrix ring
for example if \(A =\left[\begin{matrix} 1&2\\3&1\end{matrix}\right]\), then \(A= 1\left[\begin{matrix} 1&0\\0&0\end{matrix}\right]=2\left[\begin{matrix} 0&1\\0&0\end{matrix}\right]+3\left[\begin{matrix} 0&0\\1&0\end{matrix}\right]+1\left[\begin{matrix} 0&0\\0&1\end{matrix}\right]\), right?
the rest is just matrix multiplication notation which is good to struggle through but not fascinating
Now there is a problem: the hint says to prove that \[\large E_{i,j}E_{k,l}=\delta_{j,k}E_{i,l} \] This is not true!!
*+ before 2, not =
That is true, it leads to 0 is ideal
\[\large E_{2,2}\cdot E_{3,2}= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}\cdot \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} =0\]
because the basis \(E_{ij}\) is independent, hence \(E_{ij}E_{kl}=0\)
so that either \(\delta_{ij}=0\) or \(E_{kl}=0\), but \(E_{kl}\neq 0\), hence only \(\delta_{ij}=0\)
and \(\delta_{ij}\) are entry of ideal, and it =0--> ideal =0, right?
spose \[ M= \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} a & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \\ \end{array} } \right] \] in in the ideal then since \[ \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} a& 0 \\ 0& 0 \\ \end{array} } \right]\times \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 0& \frac{b}{a} \\ 0 & 0 \\ \end{array} } \right] \] is in the ideal, so is \[ \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 0 & b \\ 0 & 0 \\ \end{array} } \right] \]
and therefore so is every damned matrix
once you got one non zero entry, you got them all
@misty1212 M is a left ideal but not a right one--> hence M is not an ideal
oh my M is a matrix not an ideal i think i am not really getting the idea across though
If \(I\subset M\) is an ideal (left and right) and if X is a matrix in \(I\) with some non-zero entries (say \(X_{j,k}=\beta\neq0\)) then \[\large E_{j,k}X(1/\beta)E_{j,k}=E_{j,k}\in I \]
then?
And using what misty did. u can put 1's in row j and column k.
After awhile, I confused though. hehehe... what is an ideal? and what is the relationship between left/ right ideal with ideal?
\[\large \begin{pmatrix} a & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}\cdot\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1/a\\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \] \[\large \begin{pmatrix} 1/a & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}\cdot\begin{pmatrix} a & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \] \[\large \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0\\ 1/a & 0 \end{pmatrix}\cdot\begin{pmatrix} a & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \]
all these r in \(I\)
an ideal is both left and right ideal.
and they not need equal, right? just being left and right ideal at the same time,right?
yes
Thank you.
I can't figure out a way to put \(E_{2,2}\) in \(I\), though.
:(
sorry. gotta go.
Thanks for response. I will let my argument here, please check if you have time.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!