Question about FCT?
I so far found the antiderivatives to get g(x).
I think you meant "FTC" for "fundamental theorem of calculus"
you're basically using FTC part 1, which says If \[\Large g(x) = \int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt\] then \[\Large g'(x) = f(x)\]
it's possible that the endpoints of the intervals change from closed to open but I'm not 100% sure on that
oh nvm, it says nothing about finding the derivative of g
Okay
but yes you'll find the antiderivatives and use the second part of the FTC, which is \[\Large \int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a)\] where F ' = f
okay, so far I've got g(x)= 0 if x<0, 1/2 * x^2 if 0<x<1, 2x-1.2*x^2 if 1<x<2, 0 if x>2
However, I'm just confused on if I should add a c two the second and third part of the piece wise function...
Thank you for helping me so far :)
you should have \[\LARGE g(x) = \begin{cases} C \ \text{ if } x < 0 \\ \frac{x^2}{2} \ \text{ if } 0 \le x \le 1 \\ 2x-\frac{x^2}{2} \ \text{ if } 1 < x \le 2 \\ D \ \text{ if } x > 2 \\ \end{cases} \] C and D are constants
would it be x^2/2 + C?
oh right, forgot about the middle constants, let me redo
\[ \LARGE g(x) = \begin{cases} C_{1} \ \text{ if } x < 0 \\ \frac{x^2}{2}+C_{2} \ \text{ if } 0 \le x \le 1 \\ 2x-\frac{x^2}{2}+C_{3} \ \text{ if } 1 < x \le 2 \\ C_{4} \ \text{ if } x > 2 \\ \end{cases} \] C1 through C4 are constants
Alrighty, now how would we graph this? Can I state that C can equal zero and this will not affect the shape of the graph but only the vertical location of the graph?
although, when you use FTC part 2, I think the middle constants C2 and C3 will subtract and cancel out the same may happen with C1 and C4. I'm not sure about that though
How does it cancel out?
if so, then you'd be left with \[ \LARGE g(x) = \begin{cases} 0 \ \text{ if } x < 0 \\ \frac{x^2}{2} \ \text{ if } 0 \le x \le 1 \\ 2x-\frac{x^2}{2} \ \text{ if } 1 < x \le 2 \\ 0 \ \text{ if } x > 2 \\ \end{cases} \]
well let's say that f(x) = x the antiderivative is F(x) = (x^2)/2 + C then use FTC part 2 to evaluate. Using FTC 2 means we use this property \[\Large \int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a)\]
when we get to the F(b) - F(a) part, the constants cancel (since you're subtracting C1 from itself, for instance)
I'm still not understanding... So we subtract the different parts of the piece wise function? Could you maybe give me an example please ? :)
let's use f(x) = x as an example
Jim, would the equations in g(x) be considered integrals? The problem states to not include them in g(x) *worry face*
actually let f(t) = t \[\Large \int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt\] \[\Large \int_{0}^{x}tdt\] \[\Large \left. \frac{t^2}{2}+C\right]_{0}^{x}\] \[\Large \left[\frac{x^2}{2}+C\right]-\left[\frac{0^2}{2}+C\right]\] \[\Large \frac{x^2}{2}+C-\frac{0^2}{2}-C\] \[\Large \frac{x^2}{2}\]
so hopefully you can see how \[\Large \int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt = \Large \frac{x^2}{2}\] and how the constant canceled
Yes, i see now!
so that's what I think is happening with each sub-interval (and each antiderivative)
Then you simply just graph f(x) and g(x) on those intervals?
yes correct
if you want, you can plot points for g(x) to generate points for g(x), you simply record the area under the curve from 0 to x (under f(x))
Wait so we would be follow the equation we made for g(x) to make the graph of it?
that is another alternative, yes
Alright, thank you Jim.
you're welcome
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!