What are the main differences between ionic and covalent?
All I know is ionic= between metal and non metal charge must be 0 naming begins with the cation and ends with the anion (anion ends with ide) covalent= between 2 non metals charge must also be 0. naming completely based on amount per element anything else I should know?
sharing of electrons vs. positive and negative charge attractions
@Zale101
also is it safe to say that ionic compounds use the selected oxidation states while covalent can vary?
Ionic bonding is when valence electrons of an atom is \(\color{red}{transfered}\) to another atom. Covalent bonding is when valence electrons of an atom is \(\color{red}{shared}\) with another atom.
Good points. Is what I said all true, though?
Yes, what you said seems correct to me.
Also, if you don't mind. Can you clarify synthesis for me real quick? CO2 2CO2 Both are synthesis, right? But let's say it was C2O, then it's not, right? So there can't be a number in between the elements? Only before and after?
CO2 means that there's 1 mol of carbon and 2 mols of oxygen 2CO2, usually written in a chemical reaction when balancing, indicates that there's 2 mols of carbon and 4 mols of oxygen.
I am aware of that. That is "direct combination", though?
I'm assuming that you want to know what is a synthesis reaction? Well, a synthesis reaction is when 2 elements play as reactants to form the product as compound. Ex. 2H2(g) + O2(g) -> 2H2O is a synthesis reaction
Another example C + O2 -> CO2
And decomposition is just the exact opposite right?
CO2>>C+O2
Hmm, would a better way to remember this is that Synthesis's product will never have a + sign as it's ONE product decomposition's product will always have a + sign or multiple ones
I dont think CO2 would decompose
it couldn't go through a decomposition?
A synthesis reaction would be reactant + reactant --> product two reactant will form a complex substance. CO2 won't decompose as it is a decomposition product. A decomposition reaction would be reactant --> product + product A a complex substance (reactant) produces two product I better example would be water, 2H2(g) + O2(g) -> 2H2O in a decomposition reaction, water can break down to hydrogen gas and oxygen gas. 2H2O(g) -> 2H2(g) + O2(g)
CO2 is pretty stable not to decompose
To break it down, it must be another element right? As you broke down oxygen there
When it says synthesis and decomposition reactionare opposite of each other, it means that the process of their chemical reactions is done differently (oppsitely) it doesn't necessarily have to be the same chemical reaction that was synthesized can be decomposed back. Again, water can do that but not every chemical reaction that is synthesized will get decomposed back.
in decomposition, the reactant can be a compound that its product becomes two elements
reactions* not reactionare
makes sense
Any explanation of why my book says Get the decomposition of ammonia into its elements And the answer is 2NH3>>>N2+3H2 Why is ammonia 2nh3 instead of just nh3..?
@Kainui
@dan815
@SolomonZelman
"And the answer is 2NH3>>>N2+3H2 Why is ammonia 2nh3 instead of just nh3..?" because you need to balance the atoms on both sides, notice you have \(N_2\), two N atoms on the right.
But isn't it originally NH3 and would just be N+H3?
@DanJS
N doesnt exist by itself, it exists as \(N_2\) to satisfy the octet rule.
Diatomic molecule..?
otherwise N can have a charge of -3 so i'm not sure why you need 2 of them
\(N^{3-}\) doesnt exist by itself in real life
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!