When looking at a rational function, Jamal and Angie have two different thoughts. Jamal says that the function is defined at x = −3, x = −4, and x = 6. Angie says that the function is undefined at those x values. Describe a situation where Jamal is correct, and describe a situation where Angie is correct. Is it possible for a situation to exist where they are both correct?
For Jamal could I say he is correct if the function is (x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6)/6
@Directrix could you help me again?
From the wording in the question, do you think Jamal and Angie are both looking at the same function?
Maybe. But it says describe a situation where they'd both be correct.
I came up with this: Jamal would be correct if the function were (x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6)/6 or (-3 + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6). He would be correct because the solution would be 0/6 or 0. Angie would be correct if the function were 3/(x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6) or 3/(-3 + 3)(-4 + 4)(6 - 6). The function would be undefined at those x values because the denominator would equal 0.
Because if it is the same function, both J and A could not both be correct because a given function is or is not defined at specific points.
I think I'm supposed to just come up with a function where they'd both be correct, like I did
y =[ (x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6)] /6 This function is defined at x = -3, x = -4 and x = 6. How could Angie say the same function is not defined at these points?
She could say it's not defined because the solution is 0?
Angie could look at the reciprocal of that function and then her statements would be true. y = 6 / [ (x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6)]
0 and undefined are not the same concept.
So I should just use the same function but flipped for Angie?
5/0 is undefined but 0/5 = 0 and is, of course, defined.
Let me think. When the function is flipped, it becomes a different function.
I think that would make sense though. It would become a different function but I think that's fine for this question
Because at the end it asks for a situation where they are both correct
This is what I have now - Jamal would be correct if the function were (x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6)/6 or (-3 + 3)(-4 + 4)(6 - 6)/6. He would be correct because the solution would be 0/6 or 0 which is defined. Angie would be correct if she looked at the reciprocal of Jamal's function which is 6/(x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6) or 6/(-3 + 3)(-4 + 4)(6 - 6). The function would be undefined at those x values because the denominator would equal 0.
Look at this attachment. Let's talk about it.
I saw that and thought it was a good example...I was trying to change mine up to avoid plagiarism
I don't know why people do not write y= when writing a function. Anyway, look at the function that is said to be the one where J and K are both correct.
I am not advocating plagiarism. I'm looking at how other people have interpreted this problem.
That attachment comes from here: http://openstudy.com/updates/52ad5647e4b0b09acc7f8ce5
The function would be y = 0/0. Wouldn't this be undefined because of the denominator being 0?
Angie correct, Jamal wrong: y =[ (x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6)] /6 This function is defined at x = -3, x = -4 and x = 6.
And wouldn't Angie be incorrect there since that would be y = 0/6 which is defined?
This is thought of as indeterminate. 0/0 Division is defined in terms of multiplication. 6 divided by 2 = 3 if and only if 2*3 =6 5/0 is undefined because there is no number times 0 which gives 5.
On 0/0, any number times 0 = 0 so you could say that every number in the world could = 0/0. So, it is indeterminate. Most people just say division by 0 is undefined.
Ah ok, so saying they are both correct if the function is y=(x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6)/(x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6) would be correct?
Or not really because it's neither defined or undefined
Before we get to both correct, if that is true. On what equation was Jamal correct and Angie wrong?
Jamal was correct on y=(x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6)/6
And Angie was wrong on that one because the function is defined
This function where both are supposedly correct seems off to me.
I don't think it's possible for them to both be right on that function because it's not defined or undefined
Was my other answer correct?
Many people would take y = y=[(x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6])/[(x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6)] and say that it is really just y = 1 after the common factors are divided out.
That's true
But, that is not true because to divide, say (x+3) by (x + 3), you would have to say that the answer is y = 1 where x is not equal to -3. So, the answer is y = 1 with a hole at the point (-3, 1).
Y = (x^2 - 1)/(x - 1) does not have the same graph as y = x + 1. They are close but not the same.
I'm thinking there isn't a situation where they could both be correct
We divide that stuff out all the time in Algebra without specifying that certain values of x have to be excluded.
I agree with you. I do think that there is a function where the two of them THINK they are both right. But, thinking they are right does not make their thinking correct.
Let's look at the problem again.
I just don't see how a function could be defined and undefined at the same x values
>> Is it possible for a situation to exist where they are both correct? No, there cannot be.
Sounds good
>>I just don't see how a function could be defined and undefined at the same x values Right. That is against the consistency of mathematics.
Whoever wrote that question is not a math person. Math people write cleanly and crisply and leave nothing to chance interpretation. So, if the computer or whatever says "wrong" on this, then we must protest.
Well after my teacher grades it I will try to let you know what he says
Can I show you my entire answer and we can rreview it?
Yes, and speak up for the mathematics we discussed and don't back down.
Yes, do that.
Jamal would be correct if the function were f(x)=(x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6)/6. He would be correct because the solution would be 0/6 or 0 which is defined. Angie would be correct if she looked at the reciprocal of Jamal's function which is f(x)=6/(x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6). The function would be undefined at those x values because the denominator would equal 0. It is not possible for a situation to exist where they are both correct because a function can't be defined and undefined at the same x values.
>> He would be correct because the solution would be 0/6 or 0 which is defined. I get what you are saying but 0 is not a solution to that function. Jamal would be correct if the function were f(x)=(x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6)/6. He would be correct because the function is defined at the points where x = - 3, -4, and 6. The value of the function at any one of those x-values would be 0.
So just change my wording?
Angie would be correct if she looked at the reciprocal of Jamal's function which is f(x)=6/[(x + 3)(x + 4)(x - 6)]. The function would be undefined at those x values of -4, -4, and 6 because any one of those 3 x-values would cause the denominator to equal 0.
ok I got it :)
A function is undefined at a point but a function is not just globally undefined. It is a concept of undefined at a point.
And, a big no on that third part. As you said, how can the function be simultaneously defined and undefined at the same points.
Exactly. I think we've got this one figured out
Alrighty, then. I so enjoyed the discussion with full participation on the part of us both. Let's do it again sometime, okay?
Okay :) Thank you again for all of your help!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!