How did the opposition to and subsequent rejection of the League of Nations affect US policy at the beginning of World War II?
The United States were members of the League and were immediately involved.
The United States would only provide economic aid to their allies on a lend-lease policy.
The United States had reverted to a policy of isolationism, and therefore remained neutral.
The United States supported both sides with weapons under a cash and carry policy.

Question

How did the opposition to and subsequent rejection of the League of Nations affect US policy at the beginning of World War II?
The United States were members of the League and were immediately involved.
The United States would only provide economic aid to their allies on a lend-lease policy.
The United States had reverted to a policy of isolationism, and therefore remained neutral.
The United States supported both sides with weapons under a cash and carry policy.

anonymous · Answer

Which one do you think it is?

anonymous · Answer

The United States would only provide economic aid to their allies on a lend-lease policy. @Lady.Liv1776

anonymous · Answer

Actually I believe it is that the United States reverted to Isolationism. 

The United States reverted to this because if they joined the League it would cause them to enter into wars that would ultimately be unwanted on American soil. Since then America has remained Isolated from European affairs, and remained neutral. They do help their allies, but not economically. If needed, they help them with troops.