A certain radioactive isotope has a half-life of 11 days. If one is to make a table showing the half-life decay of a sample of this isotope from 32 grams to 1 gram; list the time (in days, starting with t = 0) in the first column and the mass remaining (in grams) in the second column, which type of sequence is used in the first column and which type of sequence is used in the second column?
@perl :)
do you know the formula for half-life?
no :/ this lesson told us basically nothing
exponential functions?
I am somewhat familiar with exponential functions.
good
so at let us make sure we agree that \(t=0 \rightarrow t=11 \) half of that species (whatever radioactive isotope) will be gone
yes, I would agree with that
next, is that we need to identify the constant in which the decay occurs by using \(0.5 = e\large^{11k} \)
understand that we are calculating by "days" from the basis of the problem presented
would you try to solve for k?
time = half-life * log (begng amount / ending amt) / log 2
let us do it this way then I will teach you how to derive for any rate-related problem later without memorizing anything
I honestly am completely clueless on how to solve for k.
ah, so this is the part of the exponential functions that you will have to make use of logarithmic functions
have you got any idea about logs?
my formula is easier to use but you want to use that other one huh? 'k' (sometimes called lambda) is equal to natural log (2) / half-life
everyone's formula is always easier for the lazy mind, learning how that formula arose is for the inquiring mind
Yes, I know logarithms some, I am unable to do anything on the computer on OS. It just completely froze.
okay inquirer k = 0.69314718056 / 11
or k = 0.0630133801
we can solve for k by using \(ln(0.5) = 11k \) then manipulate so you have the equation as k
the reason we are not trying to get the actual value is so that we do not fall into the traps of "estimation." we will do this in the very end
I am VERY familiar with half life calculations here is a calculator I wrote http://www.1728.org/halflife.htm it does not do anything with estimation
-0.693147 = 11k -0.063013\(\overline{36}\) = k
would it suffice and would it hurt anyone's ego for now if we just used \(\huge \frac{ln(0.5)}{11} = k \)
that would be fine with me
that works too :)
next, pay attention to the instruction: If one is to make a table showing the half-life decay of a sample of this isotope from 32 grams to 1 gram; list the time (in days, starting with t = 0) in the first column and the mass remaining (in grams) in the second column
got a paper and pen or a word or even spreadsheet software so it is neat-looking
|dw:1423805959523:dw|
Okay sorry, I put the columns in the wrong order
ye, paying to the instruction is crucial specially in the fields of science like chemistry and physics
This is pretty complicated for me, but I understand it better now :)
haha so we will try to go down from day 0 then increment of 1 until we get really near to the value of the mass to 1 gram so we don't have to waste so much lines
=) thank you both
so you know how to do the rest?
I mean we are not done
time(days) remaining amt 0 32 0.5038406 31 1.0242034 30 1.5622091 29 2.1190959 28 2.6962375 27 3.2951631 26 3.9175819 25 4.5654125 24 5.2408185 23 5.9462522 22 6.6845083 21 7.4587910 20 8.2727974 19 9.1308250 18 10.0379087 17 11.0000000 16 12.0242034 15 13.1190959 14 14.2951631 13 15.5654125 12 16.9462522 11 18.4587910 10 20.1308250 9 22.0000000 8 24.1190959 7 26.5654125 6 29.4587910 5 33.0000000 4 37.5654125 3 44.0000000 2 55.0000000 1
there it is with the columns in the correct order AND I deleted the previous answer
or you can start from 0th day then jump to 11th day since we already know that half of the mass will remain cutting our work more systematically
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!