Which sentence is not a suitable correction for the run-on sentence? I have to find my bike in the morning it's my only transportation. A. I have to find my bike in the morning, it's my only transportation. B.I have to find my bike in the morning; it's my only transportation. C.I have to find my bike in the morning. It's my only transportation.
the comma is not as strong to comprehend separating 2 complete sentences.
and where is this comma trying to accomplish this in which of the options ?
Another way to do it, is to still have a comma, but to subordinate part of the sentence
but, which option has comma separating 2 full sentences? that one is incorrect.
i think its either a or b, but im leaning more toward b
B has a semi-colon separating 2 sentences. Semi-colon is a "strong" punctuation mark, and it could comprehend this task.
In option C, are any of the sentences you see fragments? If yes, C is an incorrect way to do it. if no C is the correct way to do it.
you can test the fragment-ness. (excuse me for this word) by "it is true that" test. for example: \(\normalsize\color{royalblue}{ \rm It~is~true~that~\color{black}{} }\)I have to find my bike in the morning. (this is good).
also, I have to find my bike in the morning, \(\normalsize\color{royalblue}{ \rm since }\) it's my only transportation.
hello ??
I think you could go with B.I have to find my bike in the morning; it's my only transportation.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!