Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 7 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

calculus. did i do this right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{n-1}\frac{ \ln(n) }{ n }\]=

OpenStudy (anonymous):

=\[\frac{ d }{ dx }\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\frac{ \frac{ 1 }{ n } }{ n }*\frac{ n }{ n }=\frac{ 1 }{ n^2 }\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

then by the p series 2>1 so the series is convergent?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i always screw up the ln stuff. just cant seem to get it down

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

you are taking the derivative of top and bottom, as I see? but isn't (-1)^(n-1) also on the top ? the top is not just infinity, it is going from negative to positive infinity depending on whether n-1 is even or odd.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh yes... so how should i have done it with this then?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

if i do the alternating series test... how is ln (n+1) less than ln (n)?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i didnt mean to say "how is" i just mean "is"

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

this is what wolf got

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

not much, hah ?

OpenStudy (freckles):

were you trying to use alternating test and then use losptial to find the limit of ln(n)/n as n approaches infinity ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

nope. they didnt tell us anything. i do know the answer is convergent. I just dont know how to get there properly

OpenStudy (anonymous):

freckles! yes, that is what i was attempting

OpenStudy (freckles):

\[\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\frac{\ln(n)}{n}=\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\frac{(\ln(n))'}{(n)'}=?\]

OpenStudy (freckles):

after you show that approaches 0 you need to show ln(n)/n is decreasing if possible

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i thought it was \[\frac{ \frac{ 1 }{ n } }{ n }\] but then i realized i didnt take the bottom properly and now i think its just \[\frac{ 1 }{ n }\]. which is divergent by the harmonic series but convergent by the Alt Ser Test, i think

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I am not sure if ln(n+1) is less than ln(n)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i want to say yes it is, but the ln's always mess me up in my head

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

\[a\gt b \implies \ln(a) \gt \ln(b)\]

OpenStudy (freckles):

http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/AlternatingSeries.aspx I'm going by this site we have the first thing we need now we need to see if we have the second thing: \[\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\frac{\ln(n)}{n}=\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\frac{1}{n}=0\] we need to see if : \[\frac{\ln(n)}{n} > \frac{\ln(n+1)}{n+1} \text{ for all } n>0\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

on my calc, it says that ln(1)=0 and ln(2) = .693147..

OpenStudy (anonymous):

calculator*

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

that is true since a>b implies lna>lnb :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hi X! what do you mean by that ? is this a rule i dont know about?

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

hey there :) no i was just clarifying when you said ln1=0 and ln2=0.6 i said in general a>b gives lna>lnb this is always true

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

why don't we do the integral here?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it is the alternating series test

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i need to prove that a_n > a_n+1 but i dont see it..im doing something wrong

OpenStudy (anonymous):

if you feel the integral will work, id be happy to try it with you

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i hate that one the most tho lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@xapproachesinfinity . after applying the integral test, that just ends with 1/n, right? and by theory, that is 0= convergent. is this all i need?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

you may use first derivative to prove lnx/x is decreasing for x > e

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

f(x) = lnx/x f'(x) = (1-lnx)/x^2 < 0 for all x > e

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@ganeshie8 becaue e=1 right?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

do you mean ln e = 1 ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes, sorry

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

hmm now that i think about integral test may not be your way out i was just throwing ideas lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

im taking any suggestion, dont apologize. Its appreciated

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

hmm so lnx/x > ln(x+1)/x+1 for x>e

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok, so let me sum this up\[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{n-1}\frac{ \ln(n) }{ n }\rightarrow \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\frac{ \ln(n)' }{ n' }= \frac{ 1 }{ n }\] which is zero and then \[a_n >a_n+1 \] because ln(1)<lne......?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

then these two factors meet the requirements of the alternating series test for convergence?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

hold up what exactly is your goal here ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

to prove A) that the lim n>infinty= zero and that a_n > a_n+1

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

you had some feeling that the given infinite sum converges to some number as it might satisfy the requirements of alternating series test

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

You need to prove 3 things to conclude the series covnerges using alternating series test : 1) \(\frac{\ln n}{n}\ge 0\) for all \(n\) 2) \(\lim\limits_{n\to \infty}\frac{\ln n}{n} = 0\) 3) \(\{\frac{\ln n}{n}\}\) is a decreasing sequence

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok..

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Did you prove each of them ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i proved the lim=0 and you tell me i am aloud to use lne=1 to prove decreasing... but does this also prove that a_n>a_n+1 ? this is where i was before you told me about the lne

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

a_n>a_n+1 is the same as showing that the series decrease

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

considering that a_n=lnn/n

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh... ok. so what i posted above... where i said "ok, so lets sum this up"... is that correct?

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

the limit has been proved to be zero you need 1) i think the third step has also been proved but for x>e

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

the notation is not so great in that reply. you might be right but your prof will give you 0 marks if you submit that http://gyazo.com/d89d7df15ca83f70e4756bd4320e18f1

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

oh yeah the way you put it is not good :P lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lol. how should i put it?

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

\[\lim_{n\to \infty} \ln n/n=\lim_{n\to \infty }\frac{1}{n}=0\] and you don't need lne>ln1 thingy

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

^

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks. its just kinda confusing to me that they want me to prove all these things and then just telling them the lim=0 is enough.

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

hey do we need to show that it is decreasing for any positive n?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Alt Series Test, from my instructions says to prove lim=o and that a_n> a_n+1

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

that will do for second requirement next, you may use first derivative test to prove that the sequence is decreasing. after that you will be ready to conclude the series converges using alternating series test

OpenStudy (anonymous):

my personal response would be the argument that\[\frac{ 1 }{ n }>\frac{ 1 }{ n+1 }\]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Yes. I am also trying to work it without using derivatives : \[n < n+1 \implies \dfrac{1}{n} \gt \dfrac{1}{n+1}\] I'm bit stuck after this.. not sure how to proceed :/

OpenStudy (anonymous):

if i can use that... then we have met the requirements

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

use what ?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

derivatives ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the argument that 1/n> 1/n+1 to satisfy that an is bigger

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

1/n > 1/(n+1) is true and we can use it but this itself doesn't prove the sequence is decreasing

OpenStudy (anonymous):

this is where i get confused, because i thought we proved that with the ln e> x

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

@ganeshie8 didn't you prove the series decreasing using derivatives? why you trying other alternatives ? i was thinking about ln n/n >0 for any n is this necessary

OpenStudy (anonymous):

also, i understand your reasoning. but my instructions do not ask me to prove decreasing. although proving an>an+1 kinda does all by itself, right?

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

yes that is the same thing

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok. I think i will stick with what we have here then. I TOTALLY appreciate all the help guys. wish i knew how to give more than one medal

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

there is a way to give more than one medal but its more of like a bug... I'll give medals to everyone that helped in this thread :)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

btw sometimes you're not allowed to use derivatives because sequences and series are covered before derivatives and integrals (save integral test)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok! thank you!

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

hmm we didn't do them yet! this is part of calc2 the last thing we deal with is series and sequence in the program

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

i'm in calc2 still in by parts lol we are slow hahaha

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i hate by parts! and i am gonna have to brush back up on that at the the end of this semester because our final is comprehensive

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

hehehe last two weeks i was doing some interesting by parts integrals

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i bet

OpenStudy (anonymous):

look through my questions i have posted, you will see all the integration by parts questions i posted

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

a lot of your question are about series lol actually i like series xD i just need to refresh things

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but if you look way back into lets say beginning of january, you will see the integration stuff

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

i see, i will take a look later gotta go see ya

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok have good one

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!