Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 15 Online
Parth (parthkohli):

\[f(x) = \dfrac{ax + b}{cx + d}\]Find the general form of\[f^{(n)}(x)\]

hartnn (hartnn):

n'th Successive differentiation. Tried Lebnitz rule?? ax+b and 1/(cx+d)

OpenStudy (michele_laino):

Please you have to use the induction principle

OpenStudy (michele_laino):

@ParthKohli

OpenStudy (michele_laino):

starting point: \[\frac{d}{{dx}}\frac{{ax + b}}{{cx + d}} = \frac{{a\left( {cx + d} \right) - \left( {ax + b} \right)c}}{{{{\left( {cx + d} \right)}^2}}} = \frac{{ad - bc}}{{{{\left( {cx + d} \right)}^2}}}\]

Parth (parthkohli):

My book says that you can transform two functions into one and THEN use the induction principle, which makes things easier for us.

Parth (parthkohli):

Here is what the transformation is:\[\dfrac{ax + b}{cx + d} = \dfrac{a}{c} + \dfrac{bc - ad}{c(cx + d)}\]

OpenStudy (michele_laino):

sincerely I have thought to the what you say, nevertheless if I apply repetedly the derivation operator I got your result anyway

OpenStudy (michele_laino):

oops... repeatedly...

OpenStudy (michele_laino):

for example I got these results: \[\begin{gathered} f''\left( x \right) = - 2c\frac{{ad - bc}}{{{{\left( {cx + d} \right)}^3}}} \hfill \\ f'''\left( x \right) = 6{c^2}\frac{{ad - bc}}{{{{\left( {cx + d} \right)}^4}}} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \]

Parth (parthkohli):

Yup, that's what I did to solve this question too. The reason I asked this is that transformation. Is that transformation useful in other areas of calculus? And does it have a special name?

OpenStudy (michele_laino):

yes! that transformation is useful in the area of the complex analysis, more precisely: the transformation below: \[w = f\left( z \right) = \frac{{az + b}}{{cz + d}}\]

OpenStudy (michele_laino):

where: \[ad - bc \ne 0\] establish a bijective correspondence between the z-plane and the w-plane

OpenStudy (michele_laino):

they are called "mappings"

OpenStudy (michele_laino):

or Moebius transformations

Parth (parthkohli):

That's exactly the answer I was looking for! Thanks!

OpenStudy (michele_laino):

thanks!

OpenStudy (rational):

you just did long division and calling it with crazy names haha

Parth (parthkohli):

lol

Parth (parthkohli):

I'm so stupid, haha...

Parth (parthkohli):

Still laughing at my stupidity...

OpenStudy (rational):

\[\begin{align}\dfrac{d^n}{dx^n}\left(\dfrac{ax+b}{cx+d}\right) &= \dfrac{d^n}{dx^n}\left(\frac{a}{c}+\frac{bc-ad}{c}\dfrac{1}{cx+d}\right)\\~\\ &= \dfrac{d^n}{dx^n}\left(\frac{a}{c}\right) + \frac{bc-ad}{c}\dfrac{d^n}{dx^n}\left(cx+d\right)^{-1}\\~\\ &= \dfrac{d^n}{dx^n}\left(\frac{a}{c}\right) + \frac{bc-ad}{c}\dfrac{(-1)^n(n!)c^n}{(cx+d)^{n+1}}\\~\\ \end{align}\]

Parth (parthkohli):

Yeah, done...

OpenStudy (rational):

In moving from second line to third line below formula is used \[\dfrac{d^n}{dx^n}(ax+b)^m = a^nm(m-1)(m-2)\cdots(m-n+1)(ax+b)^{m-n}\] plugin \(m=-1\)

Parth (parthkohli):

Are you ganeshie?

OpenStudy (rational):

idk who he is but this is not the first time somebody asking me this :/

Parth (parthkohli):

WHAT THE HELL?! I'VE ALWAYS BELIEVED THAT YOU'RE GANESHIE. OK, so you're rsadhvika then?

OpenStudy (rational):

thats another user that ppl confuse me and ganeshie wid hmm

Parth (parthkohli):

No, I'm pretty sure you said somewhere that you're rsadhvika.

Parth (parthkohli):

And I'm also pretty sure that you said somewhere that you're ganeshie.

Parth (parthkohli):

By transitive property, ganeshie = rsadhvika! :O

hartnn (hartnn):

ganeshie = rsadhvika rational is different.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!