hey dose anyone know how to do the problem 2y^3 - 128 the formula for this that I am trying to use is difference of squares A^3 - B^3 = (A-B) (A^2 + AB + B^2) the direct5ions fo this problem are to factor out completely i am very confused please help!
first off, factor 2 out, you have 2(y^3-64) , ok now, right?
yes
good!
okay so whats the next step and your getting the 64 from 128 right?
could you use the draw thing if you could show your steps that would help a lot.
hint: 64 = 4^3 so 2(y^3-64) = 2(y^3-4^3)
:) @huntergirl1 When you said yes, I thought you got all of them since you gave me the formula. You just apply the formula you post to get the answer.
okay so i end up with what i started with which is great because that was the correct answer and yes sorry i was having a dyslexia moment with the 64 thing i understand what you got and this is what i got... 2(y-4) (y^2 +4y +16) 2(y^3 + 4y^2 +16y -4y^2 -16y-64) i simplied with like terms and then i got this. 2(y^3-64)= 2y^3-128 the original problem
unless i am completely wrong
2y^3 - 128 2(y^3 - 64) 2(y^3 - 4^3) 2(y-4)(y^2 + y*4 + 4^2) ... apply the difference of cubes rule here 2(y-4)(y^2 + 4y + 16) and that's as far as you can go
so yes this is correct then?
the steps after 2(y-4)(y^2 + 4y + 16) appear to be you expanding everything out again, which is the opposite of what they want. They want you to factor.
okay then so all i need is the set up part?
what do you mean?
so im leaving it at 2(y-4) (y^2 +4y +16)
or is that not fully factored out?
yeah that's the fully factored form
okay thanks!! (: and also would you be up to helping me with one more? rs^2 +64? same directions and would i start by factoring the r out completely?
I don't see an 'r' in the second term
is there one?
sorry typo that 64 is supposed to have an r on it as well |
rs^3 + 64r should i take and factor out the r first?
yes, and what do you get when you do so?
r(s^3 +4^3)
is that on the right track?
yes it is
then you'll use the sum of cubes factoring formula
and once it is plugged into the formula then i am done right? with the factoring?
yes, tell me what you get
okay i got r(s+4) (s^2- 4s+ 16)
correct
okay and then i went on and i did this r(s^3 - 4s^2 + 16s+ 4s^2 -16s + 64) I'm going to combine like terms and then end up with... r(s^3 + 64) right or did i go to far
why are you expanding again? they just want you to factor
r(s+4) (s^2- 4s+ 16) is the fully factored form when you got to r(s^3 - 4s^2 + 16s+ 4s^2 -16s + 64), it's correct but not what they want. They don't want you to expand. I'm assuming they simply said "factor the expression"
they just said fator ompletely but okay so then leave it at that
yeah, r(s^3 - 4s^2 + 16s+ 4s^2 -16s + 64) takes a step backward from factoring so leave it as r(s+4) (s^2- 4s+ 16)
okay then but if i was going to check this because i have a quiz on this information tomorrow the I would continue to expand? i would show my answer as-->r(s+4) (s^2- 4s+ 16) then expand to check my answr to make sure that it matches the original problem right? .
that is correct
okay cool!! thank you soooo much!!! i will not torture you anymore with my questions thanks for the help!!
lol you're ok, no worries. I'm glad I could help out
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!