Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 8 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

~p,~q |- ~(pVq)

OpenStudy (loser66):

you are new in the site, i guess!! Copy and paste the original problem, please. No one can help with your problem now. It is unclear and without any request

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It just means that if I have ~P and ~Q true, then prove that ~(P V Q) is true

OpenStudy (loser66):

The easiest way is drawing the truth table.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I have to use Propositional logic,

OpenStudy (mathmate):

Hint: what you're trying to proof is the forward half of De Morgan's law in propositional logic.

OpenStudy (mathmate):

You can proceed along the lines of the following: \(\forall x \in (\lnot p \land \lnot q) \Rightarrow x\notin \lnot p \land x\notin \lnot q \Rightarrow x\notin (p \lor q) \)

OpenStudy (mathmate):

\(\Rightarrow x\in \lnot (p\lor q)\) I am not sure if this is entire rigorous, but that's the idea.

OpenStudy (mathmate):

* entirely

OpenStudy (mathmate):

I still think, unless specified otherwise, the truth table approach is the easiest.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!