I'm trying to get the general solution for a higher order differential equation. I think I have the method down correctly, but sadly, I think the factorization is tripping me up. Would appreciate a nudge in the right direction. (Work attached in image).
It's probably simple enough, but I'm supposed to end up with this:
yes! I think you are right!
Ok, so what's confusing me is how to get from the first screenshot to the second.
we have to solve this equation: \[{\lambda ^2} + \lambda + 1 = 0\] furthermore each of the roots of that above equation has to be counted 2 times
Which I can get from the calculator easily enough, but doing by hand...I tried this:
Maybe I just stayed up too late last night. :)
I think that we have the subsequent steps: \[\begin{gathered} \exp \left( {rx} \right)\left( {{r^4} + 2{r^3} + 3{r^2} + 2r + 1} \right) = 0 \hfill \\ {r^4} + 2{r^3} + 3{r^2} + 2r + 1 = 0 \hfill \\ {r^4} + 2{r^3} + 3{r^2} + 2r + 1 = {\left( {{r^2} + r + 1} \right)^2} \hfill \\ So: \hfill \\ {\left( {{r^2} + r + 1} \right)^2} = 0 \hfill \\ Or: \hfill \\ {r^2} + r + 1 = 0 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \]
Oh wait, I think I see..
Wolfram's saying to complete the square. Tricky.
It is the same, we will get the same answers
Computing.......... :)
I would use the quadratic formula
Ah, guh! Of course! Sometimes I get so deep in to the hard stuff that I forget the fundamentals.
though you are left with taking the square root of a complex number, which looks painful
I don't think it'll be as bad as the way I was trying to do it.
You can't imagine how much I was looking forward to feeling sheepish over finally seeing the one little thing that was holding me up. :D
Thank you both!
So the vector space of your solution is generate by the set of the subsequent functions: \[\left\{ {\exp \left( {\frac{{ - 1 + i\sqrt 3 }}{2}} \right),\;\exp \left( {\frac{{ - 1 - i\sqrt 3 }}{2}} \right),\;x\exp \left( {\frac{{ - 1 + i\sqrt 3 }}{2}} \right),\;x\exp \left( {\frac{{ - 1 - i\sqrt 3 }}{2}} \right)} \right\}\]
it looks like after finding the roots of r^2 + r +1=0 we switch to polar coords, we can use \[ \sqrt{ a \exp(i \theta)} = \sqrt{a} \exp\left(i \frac{\theta}{2} \right) \]
And now Euler's Formula kicks in.
yes, then back to rectangular to get the posted answers
Wow, tricky. I guess that's what I get for doing it ahead of the lecture.
Ok, it's going to take me a bit to make sure I understand what's going on in Euler's in polar coords. I'm reading it in the text now.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!