find two different sets of parametric equations for the rectangular equation
y = 1/(x+2)
hey man i got x = t +2 and y = 1/t as the first set of parametric equation
is it right
and i was thinking on using a trig identity for the second one
hmm, that's not quite true. let's see. First, can you you tell me the domain of \(y = \frac{1}{x+2}\)? What are the possible values for x?
all real numbers except -2
Right, so we have to pick a function of t for x such that x will not be -2
but i am using a positive 2
Yes, but can it be that \(t + 2 = -2\)? Is there a value for \(t\) for which it happens?
t=-4
Right, so if we set \(x = t+2\) then for \(t = -4\) we get \(x=-2\) which we cannot use. I don't see why can't we say though: $$ x= t+2 \qquad t\neq -4 $$ Which now makes sure that x will not be -2. it seems legitimate to me
Ok, so say we have this, now you want to plug it into y. let's see what we get: $$ y = \frac{1}{x+2} \implies y = \frac{1}{(t+2) + 2} = \frac{1}{t+4} $$
So In that case I guess your set of equations will be: $$ \boxed{x = t+2 \qquad y = \frac{1}{t+4}} \qquad t\neq -4$$
you get what I mean?
sort of
do you understand why it is not y=1/t?
i see why we cant use positve 2 though
we can use, you get the set of equations above. that will not be y=1/t it will be y=1/(t+4)
because t does not equal positiv 4
ok, I lost you, what do you mean by that?
no i meant -4
ye, t cannot be -4 because it corresponds to x = -2 which causes division by zero. x = -2 is not defined in the original equation, and it is not defined here too
right
If you want y = 1/t, then we will have to say: $$ y = \frac{1}{x + 2} = \frac{1}{t} \qquad t \neq 0\\ x + 2 = t \\ x = t -2\\ \\ \boxed{x = t-2 \qquad y = \frac{1}{t}} \qquad t \neq 0 $$
so now the t does not equal 0
yes, we got a different set of equations, and here t cannot be 0. both the set above and this set represent the same equation, but the relation of x and y to t is different.
i see
so thats one can another be a trig identity like for example x = (sect)^2
it can be, but once again, we need something that will give x all the possible values it has in the original equation. if we look at \((\sec(t))^2\): http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sec%28t%29%5E2 We see it can only be positive. We need something that can be anything but -2. we can put constraints later for the -2, but we still need the rest
oh
what about tan
ye we can use it, but we have to tell when tan(t) = -2
x = (tan(t)^2 - 2
well I guess we can use \(t \neq \arctan(-2) + n\pi\) or something
again, if you do tan(t)^2 you get rid of all the negatives: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=tan%28t%29%5E2
man this is hard
i wonder when i am going to use this in real life
Lol, that's totally up to you =) Those things have their uses, but it's up to you if you want to go in there Anyway, tan(t) is fine, it is good enough as it is, it goes from infinity to -infinity Now we just have to make sure to restrict t so tan(t) will never by -2 We can say: $$ x = \tan(t) \implies y = \frac{1}{x + 2} = \frac{1}{\tan(t) + 2}\\ \tan(t) \neq -2 \implies t \neq \arctan(-2) + n\pi $$Makes sense?
Just to make it clear, arctan is the inverse function of tan. sometimes it's written as \(\tan^{-1}(...)\)
is this stuff used in engineering?
so the y = arctan(-2)+npi what does npi mean?
There are engineers that will not have to use it at all, and that's true for about anything. At some point you can get specialized at something and not deal with all the rest. But again, it has its uses and if you want you can be getting into it, it's up to you
I wrote \(t \neq \arctan(-2) + n\pi\) that means t cannot be arctan(-2) + npi It doesn't say anything about y itself
oh my bad
it's actually pretty easy to understand it. let's try something a little different first. Say you have \(y = \frac{1}{x + 2}\) and I tell you x = 4. what is y?
y = 1/6
right, and if I'd say \(x = 3\pi\)?
y = 1/3pi + 1/2
you cannot break the denominator like that, if you could then we could say: $$\frac{1}{3} = \frac{1}{1+1+1} = \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{1} = 1+1+1 = 3$$ which is wrong.
lol sorry 1/(3pi+2)
exactly. and if i say x = tan(t)?
1/(tan(t)+2)
right, not complicated at all So whatever I set to x, I can tell what y can be. here you found y for x=tan(t)
right seems easy enough
now we just have to make sure that whatever we set to x matches the possible values of x. For example, if I set x = 4 then I can get the y = 1/6 but in the way I lost all the possible values of x. I don't limit x, I just want to 'write it differently'
so I can set for example x = 2t Now if I don't limit t at all then I know that there is a t value for every possible x value. there is only one little problem. there is also a t value for x=-2 which is NOT a possible value. So I have to put a limit on t. I say: $$x \neq -2 \implies 2t \neq -2 \implies t \neq -1$$
it is the same for tan(t) We can say: $$ x = \tan(t) \implies y = \frac{1}{\tan(t) + 2} $$ But we know that x cannot be -2. you can even look at y now, you can see that the denominator cannot be 0. so we say: $$ \tan(t) + 2 \neq 0 \implies \tan(t) \neq -2 $$To be honest, maybe it's sufficient to leave it as it is.. but we can also limit the values of t itself: $$ \tan(t) \neq -2 \implies t \neq \arctan(-2) + n\pi $$
okay
so that's it.. we can say our second set can be: $$ \boxed{x = \tan(t) \qquad y = \frac{1}{\tan(t) + 2}} \qquad t \neq\arctan(-2) + n\pi $$
so the npi is just any value of pi?
any multiple of pi, because if you look at the tan() function you can see that it is periodic. You'll get the same value if you add or subtract \(\pi\) from the input. That also somewhat makes sense, because \(\tan(x) = \frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)}\) and for both sin() and cos(), addition of \(\pi\) to the input will swap the sign of the output. For example $$\cos(0) = 1 \qquad \cos(0+\pi) = \cos(\pi) = -1$$ So if you add \(\pi\) to the input then both sin() and cos() just swapped their signs, but the fraction of negative/negative is still positive, so you get the same value out of the fraction
thanks for that input
ok, so the two sets we have are good enough? =)
yes sir
Ok, good I hope it's clear
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!