Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 15 Online
OpenStudy (idealist10):

Find the curvature of y=sec x.

OpenStudy (idealist10):

\[k(x)=\frac{ \left| y'' \right| }{ [1+(y')^2]^{3/2} }\]

OpenStudy (idealist10):

\[y'=\sec x \tan x \]

OpenStudy (idealist10):

\[y''=\sec x(\sec^2 x+\tan^2 x)\]

OpenStudy (idealist10):

\[k(x)=\frac{ \left| \sec x(\sec^2 x+\tan^2 x) \right| }{ (1+\sec^2 x \tan^2 x)^{3/2} }\]

OpenStudy (idealist10):

Is ^ that the correct answer? Do I need to simplify it more? If so, how?

OpenStudy (idealist10):

@mathstudent55 @Nurali @Destinymasha @robtobey @ganeshie8 @SolomonZelman @freckles

OpenStudy (idealist10):

@zepdrix

OpenStudy (freckles):

so far it looks good to me let me think on the simplifying part

OpenStudy (freckles):

i honestly see no other way of writing it that would make it prettier

OpenStudy (anonymous):

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Curvature.html

OpenStudy (freckles):

http://math.kennesaw.edu/~plaval/math2203/curvature.pdf using theorem 156 on page 91

OpenStudy (freckles):

oh @robtobey I looked at that site and i didn't even see that formula on line 14 so I went to find it somewhere else :p

OpenStudy (freckles):

but I wonder if we need |y''| as the site I found suggests on top or y'' as mathworld suggests but either way I do not see a way to simplify what @Idealist10 as posted

OpenStudy (freckles):

we could write everything in terms of sec(x) and replace sec(x) with y :p

OpenStudy (freckles):

\[k=\frac{|y(y^2+(y^2-1))|}{(1+y^2(y^2-1))^\frac{3}{2}} \\ k=\frac{|2y^3-y|}{(y^4-y^2+1)^\frac{3}{2}}\]

OpenStudy (freckles):

does it say you are to write the curvature as a function of x ? if that isn't given then I don't see why we couldn't write it in terms of y

OpenStudy (idealist10):

@SithsAndGiggles

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Refer to the attachment from Mathematica 9.

OpenStudy (idealist10):

@ganeshie8 @thomaster @SolomonZelman @e.mccormick

OpenStudy (idealist10):

@SithsAndGiggles

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Seems like that as simple as it will get, though you can remove the absolute value bars from \(\sec^2x+\tan^2x\) since this factor is non-negative.

OpenStudy (idealist10):

So what's the final answer @SithsAndGiggles ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I would say you already have it.

OpenStudy (idealist10):

So the answer is \[k(x)=\frac{ \left| \sec x(\sec^2 x+\tan^2 x) \right| }{ (1+\sec^2 x \tan^2 x)^{3/2} }\]

OpenStudy (idealist10):

?

OpenStudy (idealist10):

@SithsAndGiggles

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes. Equivalent to that, you can also write \[k(x)=\frac{ | \sec x|(\sec^2 x+\tan^2 x) }{ (1+\sec^2 x \tan^2 x)^{3/2} }\] Same difference.

OpenStudy (idealist10):

Thank you so much!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!