Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 22 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

How did the Supreme Court majority argue the law of “separate but equal” was not discrimination? Check all of the boxes that apply. It was said to help preserve the peace and public order. It wasn’t really enforced on a day-to-day basis. It allegedly affected only people with a criminal record. It supposedly provided “separate but equal” facilities.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what do you think

OpenStudy (anonymous):

d

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and another one

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok

OpenStudy (anonymous):

this one is easy

OpenStudy (anonymous):

which on is it

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it's D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

medal please

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yea go with d

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i would say a and d

OpenStudy (anonymous):

cuz ik its d

OpenStudy (the_mobster):

it is A and D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i got it thxs for the help

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sure :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

your welcome

OpenStudy (anonymous):

:)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

np

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!