Picture will give explanation. I got the answer wrong and im not sure how..
gimme a sec i gotta post the pic
what grade?
calculus 2
taylor series expansion
cant help sorry
@jtvatsim
Looks good, your line when you write "substitute x^2 for x" contains an error - you shouldn't have x^5 and x^6 where they are right now. But your final answer looks correct.
Ok i think i started to understand some parts of it but im still sort of lost
which parts have you confused?
no i checked the book and the answer was wrong. I think i started my mistake by doing the integration of (1-x)^-1
because by chain rule it would have made the lnx negative and i didnt include that
id say the part i really dont get is the maclauren series of ln(1+x)
OK, as far as why it equals the expansion?
as far as why the expansion is how it is i think is what i mean to say. because shouldnt it just be the integral of (1+x)^-1?
and thats like x^n
which would make the integral of x^n equal to (1/n+1)(x^n+1)
but they just have n on the bottom not n+1
this is the answer
OK, I see what you mean. let me work something out real quick.
Still there?
yeah, sorry, had to step away from the computer for a minute
I'm starting to work out the derivation, but now I'm getting confused to! ;)
OK, so here is how we derive the Maclaurin series for ln|1 + x|
Yeah its frikken tough and I have my final next wednesday
f(x) = ln|1+x| f'(x) = 1/(1+x) = 1/(1-[-x]) But we know that 1/(1-x) = 1 + x + x^2 + ... So, 1/(1-[-x]) = 1 + (-x) + (-x)^2 + (-x)^3 + ... = 1 - x + x^2 - x^3 ...
yeah thats what i was thinking
Good, so then f'(x) = 1 - x + x^2 - x^3 ... implies that f(x) = x - x^2/2 + x^3/3 - x^4/4 ... OR ln|1 + x| = x - x^2/2 + x^3/3 - x^4/4 ...
yeah i think im following you
In other words \[\ln|1+x| = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n+1} x^n}{n}\] although you could write this using n+1 if you prefer... like this
oh so it starts at 1?
wait yeah do the n+1 one
\[\ln|1+x| = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n x^{n+1}}{n+1}\]
flutter YES
lol, these are equivalent series.
Ok yeah thats what i had from the beginning and then plugged in the x^2 to get (1/n+1)x^(2n+2)
ok then i guess thats where i was getting screwed because i didnt know they were equivalent and because the book had it the other way i just figured i was wrong
yep, you knew what you were doing, but you didn't know that you knew it... something like that. :)
i like cant thank you enough honestly
i was panicking like crazy thinking that everything i knew was wrong and that i was screwed
no worries, glad to save your view of the world... just don't divide by 0. :)
haha yeah wont be doing that. Thanks again
No probs Good luck!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!