How does the lim(a->0+) (-a^2(2lna-1))/2=0?
The a^2 part goes to zero faster than the ln(a) part goes to negative infinity.
Is this something that I should be able to prove? Or do you think that I could just state that
You can prove it using L'hospital's rule if you'd like.
Ok. Can you show me how to do that?
Because I feel like that would make it a mess
Apologies, having a bit of trouble with my browser at the moment... you would write it as ln(a) / (1/a^2) Then taking the derivative of the top and bottom, you get 1/a / (-2/a^3) which can also be written as -a^2/2 Which goes to zero as a->0.
No worries. I see. Thank you!!!
No problem. Though you should always show your work when necessary, it is occasionally useful to remember than ln(x) is overpowered by the behavior of any power of x, so x*ln(x) -> 0 as x->0 and ln(x)/x -> 0 as x->infinity.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!