Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 6 Online
OpenStudy (fellowroot):

find :sup, inf bd, int, compact on a set

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

i just want to know if im right or not here are my answers. thanks you will be a big help

OpenStudy (rational):

sup = lim((2n-1)/n) = 2

OpenStudy (rational):

isolated points : (2n-1)/n, n>=2

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

omg thank you, what about my infimum?

OpenStudy (rational):

no infimum

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

why is infimum not 3/2?

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

because there are numbers less than 3/2 I bet

OpenStudy (rational):

because there are elements less than 3/2 in the set S

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

but since unbounded below then inf is none

OpenStudy (rational):

yep!

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

GOT IT

OpenStudy (rational):

what are the definitions of int, bd and S' ?

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

in isolated point you say n>=2 why. i thought this sequence caps off at 2 and you cant have anything bigger than 2

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

interior points are point in the set which dont include boundary points

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

bd points are when if you take a tiny interval at that point you get something in the set and something outside of the set.

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

S' are the accumulation points

OpenStudy (rational):

interior points must have some open nbhd, right ?

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

right which also contain a point in S right

OpenStudy (rational):

gotcha

OpenStudy (rational):

your interior points look good to me then

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

what about compactness

OpenStudy (rational):

one sec whenever you use (2n-1)/n, you must specify n>=2

OpenStudy (rational):

for example, look at ur answer for iv : when n=1, we have (2*1-1)/1 = 1, but 1 is not an isolated point.

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

^ i just noticed this. because n=2 produces the first number in the set. Why isnt 2 a boundary point? because 2 is not in S???

OpenStudy (rational):

il need to review analysis a bit @ikram002p

OpenStudy (rational):

or @eliassaab

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

what about covers and subcovers. i dont understand the whole cover thing

OpenStudy (rational):

vi requires more justification, you need to show an opencover that doesn't have a finite subcover

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

i thought any thing with infinity on an interval doesnt have a finite subcover.

OpenStudy (rational):

right, you're supposed to provide a proper opencover and show that it doesn't have a finite subcover

OpenStudy (rational):

i think simply saying "anything with infinity.. " wont work in analysis hmm

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

finite cant match infinity is my logic

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

because it isnt big enough. LOL

OpenStudy (rational):

intuition is fine so in part vi, are you saying (-infty, 1] is an opencover of S ?

OpenStudy (rational):

that doesn't look like an opencover to me

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

yes but i think its more like an infinite union as a cover. like (-n,1] U n=1 to n=infinity

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

sure i'll be free within one hour what else left to solve ?@rational

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

@rational

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

just wanted to know if 2 was also a boundary point or not since its not in the set S

OpenStudy (rational):

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BoundaryPoint.html yes 2 is a boundary point

OpenStudy (fellowroot):

thanks!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!