(Orthogonal Functions) More info below, finding the orthogonality of a complex function in the Hermitian sense.
\[\text{Show that the set $e^{inx}, -\pi \leq x \leq \pi, n \in Z,$ is orthogonal} \]
(Orthogonal in the Hermitian sense)
My idea of this would be that if \[w(x)=u(x)+iv(x)\]is the general form of a complex function, then in this situation \[iv(x)=e^{inx}\]\[u(x)=e^0\] (Need to find the complex conjugate to compute the Hermitian) That just sounds fishy to me, though. Would that really just mean that its complex conjugate is 1? @SithsAndGiggles
The way I'm currently imagining this is that\[u(x)=0, \ \ \ iv(x)=inx, \ \ \ \overline{w}(x)=u(x)-iv(x)=e^{0-inx}=e^{-inx}\]
Is this right? @perl
@Zarkon
(Misread originally the definition of a complex function, put things as I understand them with the correct definition in the fourth from current post)
demonstrate that $$ \Large { \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{inx}\cdot \overline { e^{inx} }=0 } $$
I'm not even sure about the definition; what I want to understand before I do anything else is whether the complex conjugate of \[e^{inx}\] is\[e^{-inx}\]
Also, how did you scale up the font? I'm not sure how to do that in the OS LaTeX editor.
Alright, so that answers my question, cool. Then you just have the definite integral of zero, which is c, but since you're evaluating at those bounds, it's just c-c=0.
oh wait, its not so easy
(?)
But yeah, how did you scale up the font in the OS LaTeX editor, I need to know how to do that.
type \Large , or \large
you can use brackets around multiple sentences \Large { formulas and stuff }
Alright, awesome, I wasn't aware that would work in this environment. But yeah, why is it not so easy/what is wrong with what I said?
$$ \Large { \Large { \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{inx}\cdot \overline { e^{imx} }=0 \\\text { } \\ \text{however}\\\text { } \\ \overline { e^{imx} } = e^{-imx} } } $$
for any m not equal to n
scroll up one page to get the definition of Hermitian orthogonal
I get an HTTP 500 error, but I'll try again.
one sec, i see
Yeah, no, I agree with you on that, heh, I just am not sure how to do it from here.
click the first search link https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=show+function+is+orthogonal+hermitian+sense
then scroll up a page to get the definition of hermitian
Nah, it worked the second time for whatever reason, and I'm in agreement/knew that, just thinking about how to now demonstrate that with m =/= n.
we have to solve that integral
\[\int\limits_{}^{}e^{inx}e^{-imx}=e^{n/m}dx\]
\[\large{ \int\limits_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{n/m}dx=xe^{n/m}\bigg]^{\pi}_{-\pi} }\]
Ah, nevermind, I see what you're doing, my bad
$$ \Large { \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{inx}\cdot \overline { e^{imx}} ~dx \\= \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{inx}\cdot { e^{-imx} }~dx\\ =\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{inx-imx}~dx\\ =\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{i(n-m)x}~dx\\ } $$
\[\large{\int\limits_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{(ix)(n-m)}dx }\]
if you write click on my latex code, you can see 'show text as ' and choose TEx
(Lol for whatever reason didn't read your last line, will try to integrate/move forward from here) Alright
choose "show math as" choose Tex command. then you can copy paste (begin and end the latex code with double dollar signs)
i never use the equation editor. all the latex commands are online anyway
ok now we integrate this
\[\Large{\int\limits_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{(m-n)ix}dx= \left[ \frac{e^{(m-n)ix}}{(m-n)i} \right] }\]
I'm not sure why, as opposed to using TeX Studio, where that doesn't happen, the left bracket isn't disappearing when I go "\left.", but in any case
$$ \Large { \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{inx}\cdot \overline { e^{imx}} ~dx \\= \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{inx}\cdot { e^{-imx} }~dx\\ =\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{inx-imx}~dx\\ =\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{i(n-m)x}~dx\\ u = i(n-m)x\\ du = i(n-m)~dx\\ \frac{du}{i(n-m)}= dx \\ \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{i(n-m)x}~dx = \left [\frac{e^{(n-m)ix} } {(n-m)i} \right]_{-\pi}^{\pi} } $$
i tried the same, to delete the left bracket. wont allow it
Sorry, had to go to class. But alright, looks like this makes sense.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!