Below is a two-column proof incorrectly proving that the three angles of ΔPQR sum to 180°: Statements Reasons ∠QRY ≅ ∠PQR Alternate Interior Angles Theorem Draw line ZY parallel to segment PQ Construction m∠ZRP + m∠PRQ + m∠QRY = m∠ZRY Angle Addition Postulate ∠ZRP ≅ ∠RPQ Alternate Interior Angles Theorem m∠RPQ + m∠PRQ + m∠PQR = m∠ZRY Substitution m∠ZRY = 180° Definition of a Straight Angle m∠RPQ + m∠PRQ + m∠PQR = 180° Substitution
Which statement will accurately correct the two-column proof? The measure of angle ZRY equals 180° by definition of supplementary angles. Angles QRY and PQR should be proven congruent after the construction of line ZY. The three angles of ΔPQR equal 180° according to the Transitive Property of Equality. Line ZY should be drawn parallel to segment QR.
there is no image
ok
the statements are out of order
those are the statements given
|dw:1426693864460:dw|
ok
the first step in the proof should be Draw line ZY parallel to segment PQ Construction
|dw:1426693976152:dw|
ok
|dw:1426694189551:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!