Use the following statement attributed to the French philosopher Denis Diderot, the chief editor of the Encyclopédie, to answer the question below: "In order to shake a hypothesis, it is sometimes not necessary to do anything more than push it as far as it will go."—Public Domain What does Diderot mean by the phrase "shake a hypothesis"? combine it with another hypothesis prove it is flawed or wrong provide it with additional force interpret it literally
@lilshane
what u think here about the answer...?
To me, to shake something up is to stir up the status quo. And so it sounds like "shaking up a hypothesis" is to either show flaws in it or show there's a better alternative.
Prove it is flawed or wrong is what Diderot means by the phrase "shake a hypothesis".
I believe that the phrase "shake a hypothesis" is saying that in order to prove it is wrong or flawed, it is sometimes not necessary to do anything more than push it as far as it will go.
So, I do think that it is, to prove it is flawed or wrong. What do you think?
That's what I think as well. :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!