Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 7 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Write an indirect proof to show that opposite angles of a parallelogram are congruent. Be sure to create and name the appropriate geometric figures. This figure does not need to be submitted. Help please I don't know how to do this at all !!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Please!!!! I will fan & medal !!!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@ganeshie8

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@studygurl14

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@acarpenter2

OpenStudy (perl):

|dw:1428025684199:dw|

OpenStudy (perl):

We want to prove that \( \bf \angle A = \angle C~ and ~ \angle B = \angle D \). Assume the opposite \( \bf \angle A \neq\ \angle C. \) Can you derive a contradiction?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If A is not equal to C then they are also not equal to B & D ?

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

may be you need to extend two parallel line to use parallel lines and transverse

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

to arrive at contradiction

OpenStudy (perl):

We are given from the figure that \( \bf AB \parallel CD ~and~ BC \parallel AD\).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay , I get what your saying but i don't understand how to contradict it .

OpenStudy (perl):

|dw:1428026115728:dw|

OpenStudy (perl):

Because BC is parallel to AD, angle C and D are supplementary (they are same side interior angles ) . Similarly angle A and angle D are supplementary

OpenStudy (perl):

angles which are supplementary to the same or congruent angles are congruent themselves. and thats a contradiction, since we assumed A is not equal to D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm sorry, if I'm not saying much im trying to understand I ... Sooooo that's how I contradict it ? The BC is parallel to AD thing

OpenStudy (perl):

Do you agree that: \( \bf BC \parallel AD\), and the two lines are cut by transversal CD, therefore \(~ \bf \angle C + \angle D = 180 \).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes I do , I kinda see the parallel thing now.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so I would put to assume the negative first off negative Because BC is parallel to AD, angle C and D are supplementary (they are same side interior angles ) . Similarly angle A and angle D are supplementary

OpenStudy (perl):

so you are correct.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh okay , I see how you did that !!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh okay , I kinda see how we got to that!! Wow!

OpenStudy (perl):

We want to prove that <A = <C and <B = <D Proof: Assume the negation. That <A is not equal to <C. Then, because BC is parallel to AD with transversal CD, angle C and D are supplementary (they are same side interior angles ) . Because AB is parallel to CD with transversal AD, angles A and D are supplementary. Since <C is supplementary to <D and <A is supplementary to <D , that implies <A and <C are equal (because angles supplementary to the same angle are congruent.) Now we have <A = <C and <A \( \neq\) <C. Contradiction

OpenStudy (perl):

also you can label the theorems that you used. same side interior angles are supplementary, and angles supp. to same angle are congruent

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I got it now . Thank youu sooooo much for your help!!!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!