had to google it but my thoughts are....
X is the age of a car in a crash E(X) is the expected (age of a car in a crash), had trouble reading that part of it find x in X that balances the volume, in other words, define f in terms of x alone, integrate out the y parts \[h(x)=\int_{0}^{1}f(x,y)~dy\]
the mean of X is thereofre just the integration of xh(x)
\[E(X)=\int_{2}^{10}x\left(\int_{0}^{1}\frac1{64}(10-xy^2)~dy\right)~dx\]
it is :) and they might be lol
it takes me longer to read/comprehend the question then anything else .... that and adding seems to thru me for a loop at times.
I think I understand for the most part what's going on, like how you're getting the expectation value makes sense to me, but why are we integrating over y at all? The way I was thinking of it I just would evaluate \[\Large \int\limits_2^{10}xf(x,y)dx\] I guess evaluating over y just gives me... 100% or something?
i wasnt real sure on how to approach it, so i found the solution the determine f_x (x,y) first, which is the dy integration
the expected value of x is the point at which the volume would balance on the x=k axis
normally, w would find mean as xf(x) but we have a f(x,y) and i spose its some sort of logical progression to just get f(x,y) into a function of x
Yeah, I mean since they're independent variables it doesn't really seem like there should be much issue if there are y's there or not. By the same reasoning I think the order of integration doesn't matter the only problem I am kinda having is I feel like the integral \[\Large \int\limits_0^1\int\limits_2^{10} f(x,y)dxdy\] should equal 1. But it's a made up problem so maybe I'm looking into it too much.
the density function f(x,y) does equal out to 1
Oh so I just messed up my math haha ok
it happens at times ;)
How to power rule? XD
if we had a density function: h(x) E(X) = integration of x h(x)
so integration of f(x,y) dy gives us a function of x related to the issue
Well we already have a function of x, it just happens to be a function of y as well. We can calculate the expectation of x and not go over all y if we don't want to, we can choose to only look at it over a portion of the total owners, such as those who only insured their cars for up to half a year if we choose to go from 0 to .5 instead I think. Like if the question said Calculate the expected age of an insured automobile involved in an accident with owners who insured their cars for less than half a year. I don't know, I'm really just saying this so you can correct me if I'm wrong cause I'm curious and want to learn.
f(x,y) is not necessarily a function of x, and just subsequently a function of y tossed in. |dw:1428088998096:dw| imagine the area of xy divided into strips so that y is held constant the average of each strip is therfore (x1, x2, x3, x4, ..., xn) the average of the xs would be the average balancing point in x
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!