need help with one question need help checking my answer for one question
a) Can you reject the null hypothesis that u= 34 at the 5% significance level? Why? no, the interval (28,35) contains 34 so u = 34 is possible, so at the 5% sig level it will not be rejected b) Can you reject the null hypothesis that u= 36 at the 5% significance level? Why? yes, the interval (28,35) doesn't contain 36 so u = 36 is not possible, so at the 5% sig level it will be rejected is this correct
is this the full question/problem?
oh sorry this is the first part A 95% confidence interval for a population mean is (28, 35).
both parts look correct
okay, can you help me with this question I'm lost The P-value for a two-sided test of the null hypothesis Ho: u = 10 is 0.06. a) Does the 95% confidence interval include the value 10? Why? b) Does the 90% confidence interval include the value 10? Why?
Confidence Level = 1 - alpha alpha = 1 - (Confidence Level)
what do we do with alpha?
so if the confidence level is 95%, what is alpha?
.05?
yes
you can then determine whether or not to reject Ho
we reject it because its .05 and it isn't within the interval?
reject if (p-value) < alpha
the p value is the .06 right?
yes
okay so we don't reject it because in this case the p value (.06) is greater then the alpha (.05)
correct
okay so for b since the confidence level is 90 we do 1-.9 to get alpha which would be .1 and we reject it because the p value (.06) is less then alpha (.1)
Yes I'm getting the same as well
okay great thank you! i also have one problem i would like for you to check would that be okay?
sure
give me on second
An understanding of wingspanroach biology may lead to an effective control strategy for these annoying insects. Researchers studying the absorption of sugar by insects feed wingspanroaches a diet containing measured amounts of a particular sugar. After 10 hours, the wingspanroaches are killed and the concentration of the sugar in various body parts is determined by a chemical analysis. The paper that reports the research states that a 95% confidence interval for the mean amount (in milligrams) of the sugar in the hindguts of the wingspanroaches is 4.2+/-2.3. a) Does this paper give evidence that the mean amount of sugar in the hindguts under these conditions is not equal to 7 mg? State and base a test on the confidence interval. b) Would the hypothesis that u = 5 mg be rejected at the 5% level in favor of a two-sided alternative?
this is what i got for a a) yes /= means not equal sig. = 5% Ho = u =7mg Ha = u /= 7 mg since m = 7 isn't in the 95% confidence level using a two tailed test would make us reject null @ .05 so we can say that the mean amount of sugar is nOT equal to 7 mg
very good, the max is 4.2+2.3 = 6.5, so 7 is above that max value
so thats good for a?
this is what i got for b b) m = 5mg is in 95% confid. interval so a two tailed would make us not reject Ho @.05 and we can say that mean sugar is equal to 5 mg
agreed, 5 is somewhere in the middle of the CI
so are both my answers good?
they do
they do look good*
okay thank you, you're the best!
you're welcome
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!