Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 9 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hey I am struggling to make my values equal when I solve the same input data using different formulas and its driving me mad. If anyone'e up for having a look at my errors that would be awesome please..??

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (dan815):

this user @inkyvoyd will solve your struggles

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hey dan815, sounds good.. are you saying he's around or should I message him, sorry im not sure of where he is?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

don't know how you get your t^2= ???????? that's is not right

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you mean the formula? Yeah I have been worried that that is not correct. How about finding t time in the other formula; \[S = V _{0}t + \frac{ at ^{2} }{ 2}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That formula for, t time, has given the correct value before which is why im confused. It worked when initial velocity was 0. Whereas now that initial velocity is not 0 (its 200m/s) the formula or something is no longer working..??? It still yields the same value as the longer formula that it is derived from tho - HENCE MY CONFUSION!!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Is this definitely wrong???\[t =\sqrt{\frac{ 2S }{ 2V _{0}+a }}\]

OpenStudy (perl):

would you like help with this question?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that would be really good please?

OpenStudy (perl):

so it looks like you are throwing a projectile straight up in the air

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes, it is about a rocket. I have managed to answer the whole question in a way that gives me the correct answer which is great, but when I try and double check the values that i solved in an alternative formula, I can not get the correct answer. This is my problem. What if I happened to use the alternate formula to solve the question and got the incorrect value for t, time etc.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Would you mind please seeing what answer you get for t, time, suing this formula;

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[S= V _{0}t + \frac{ at ^{2} }{ 2 }\]

OpenStudy (perl):

you have a mistake

OpenStudy (perl):

time = 200/9.81 = 20.387 ~ 20.4 you did that correctly the mistake is after

OpenStudy (perl):

$$\rm{\Large{ 2S = t(V_o + at) \\ next~ step~ is~ wrong }}$$

OpenStudy (perl):

this is correct: $$\rm{\Large{ 2S = t(V_o + at)\\ t = \frac {2S}{V_o + at } }}$$

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok I am looking now, THANK YOU!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

where you have said this "2S=t(Vo+at)next step is wrong" what did you do with the '2' that was with the Vo? See below.. This is what I thought was correct for that step; 2S=t(2Vo+at)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

apart from that, that's ok. Im trying to isolate the t, to get it by itself so I can solve it for t. so I multiplied both sides by t, in order to get rid of the t in the base line of the fraction. This is how i ended up with t^2 by itself on the left hand side. Are you saying this is incorrect?

OpenStudy (perl):

hey

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hey...

OpenStudy (perl):

so you saw the mistake?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no im sorry, im still confused. what is the next step please that you do to get t by itself please?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I multiplied both sides by t, in order to get rid of the t in the base line of the fraction. This is how i ended up with t^2 by itself on the left hand side. Are you saying this is incorrect?

OpenStudy (perl):

yes im saying that is incorrect

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok. I can not see a way then to get t by itself. Can you help me to do that? Or is that a bad question?

OpenStudy (perl):

thats a valid question :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

phew :) thanks for coming and helping me - i had a look at a question you were working on just now and I see that this must be so so rudimentary for you, cringe. Thanks for your patience and time, I really do appreciate it

OpenStudy (perl):

i just want to show you want hapens if you multiply by t $$ \rm{\Large{ 2S = V_oT + at^2 \\ 2S = t(V_o + at)\\ t = \frac {2S}{V_o + at }\\ t\cdot t = \frac {2S\cdot t }{V_o + at } }} $$ ok this doesnt work because the t is stuck in the denominator. squaring doesnt help either . lets go back a few steps

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes thank you for feeling my pain haha. yes please :D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Can we take it either from here please so I understand what happened to the '2' let me write up what I mean please..

OpenStudy (perl):

We can go back a few steps. $$ \rm{\Large{ 2S = V_ot + at^2\\ 0=- 2S+ V_ot + at^2\\ at^2 + V_ot -2S = 0 \\ This ~ is~ a ~ quadratic~ equation~ in ~t. \\ Use ~ quadratic~ formula ~ to ~ solve~ for ~ t. \\ }} $$

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right thank you. I have my work cut out for me thats for sure. I will stop trying to apply my wrong wrong wrong formula when trying to solve linear and angular motion etc equations. Oops! Thank you once again :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I just tried to post a testimonial for you when I became a fan - dont know if it went thru, I hope so, because you rock and everyone should know that :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I see, wow. Thanks for going and plugging in my values for me so I can see it actually work. I need to do a lot of work around this, and I will :) Thanks again (I have spent longer than I'd like to admit trying and trying to get that other stuff to work out and it was just never going to the way that I was going about it. Thank you)

OpenStudy (perl):

We can go back a few steps. $$ \rm{\Large{ 2s = v_ot + at^2\\ 0=- 2s+ v_ot + at^2\\ at^2 + v_ot -2s = 0 \\ This ~ is~ a ~ quadratic~ equation~ in ~t. \\ Use ~ quadratic~ formula ~ to ~ solve~ for ~ t.\\ t = \frac{-v_o\pm \sqrt{v_o^2 - 4a(-2s)}}{2a}\\~\\ t = \frac{-200\pm \sqrt{200^2 - 4(-9.81)(-2\cdot 2038.7)}}{2(-9.81)}\\~\\ t = \frac{-200\pm \sqrt{200^2 - 1600}}{2(-9.81)} \\~\\ t = \frac{-200\pm \sqrt{38400}}{2(-9.81)} \\~\\ \\ }} $$

OpenStudy (perl):

oh i see a mistake

OpenStudy (anonymous):

impossible hahaha ;)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

AWESOME - You probably wont believe me but I have been wondering where tat got to :) GO!! THANKS !!!!

OpenStudy (perl):

i see more mistakes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

still crunching..

OpenStudy (perl):

I think its better if we use exact decimals, that way we dont have to worry about rounding or possible rounding error

OpenStudy (perl):

we know that t = 200 / 9.81 therefore s = 2 000 000 / 9.81 exactly (please verify)

OpenStudy (perl):

we know that t = 200 / 9.81 therefore s = 2 000 000 / 981 exactly (please verify)

OpenStudy (perl):

ok so far? we are going to use these exact values

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i would have thought that considering 200/9.81 20000 / 981 but once again im sure Im exposing myself :0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but if you say so, I'll follow

OpenStudy (perl):

to be clear t = 20,000 / 981 s = 2,000,000 / 981

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh yes, sorry yes.

OpenStudy (perl):

ok good

OpenStudy (perl):

I changed my mind, lets use: t = 200/9.81 s = 20,000 / 9.81 verify that is still correct

OpenStudy (perl):

that way i dont have to delete to the point that it becomes intractable

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Im double checking my exact value for S. I thought it would be S=2000/ 9.81

OpenStudy (anonymous):

HHHEEYYYYYY !! :D

OpenStudy (perl):

$$ \rm{\large{ s = v_ot + \frac{at^2}{2}\\ 2s = \color{red}2v_ot + at^2\\ 0=- 2s+2v_ot + at^2\\ at^2 + 2v_ot -2s = 0 \\ This ~ is~ a ~ quadratic~ equation~ in ~t. \\ Use ~ quadratic~ formula ~ to ~ solve~ for ~ t.\\ t = \frac{-2v_o\pm \sqrt{(2v_o)^2 - 4a(-2s)}}{2a}\\~\\ t = \frac{-2v_o\pm \sqrt{(2v_o)^2 + 8\cdot as}}{2a}\\~\\ \\ \therefore \\ t = \frac{-2\cdot 200\pm \sqrt{(2\cdot 200)^2 + 8(-9.81)( \frac{20,000}{9.81 })}}{2(-9.81)}\\~\\ \\ ~ \\ t = \frac{-2\cdot 200\pm \sqrt{(2\cdot 200)^2 + 8(-\cancel{9.81})( \frac{20,000}{\cancel {9.81} })}}{2(-9.81)}\\~\\ t = \frac{-400\pm \sqrt{400^2 - 8 \cdot 20,000}}{2(-9.81)} \\~\\ t = \frac{-400\pm \sqrt{160,000 - 160,000}}{2(-9.81)} \\~\\ t = \frac{-400\pm \sqrt{0}}{-19.62} \\~\\ t = \frac{-400}{-19.62} \pm\frac{ 0 }{-19.62} \\~\\ t = \frac{-400}{-19.62} \pm0 \\~\\ t = \frac{400}{19.62} \\~\\ t = \frac{2\cdot 200}{2\cdot 9.81} \\~\\ t = \frac{ 200}{ 9.81} }} $$

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That is nuts, you are nuts !! :D

OpenStudy (perl):

:D

OpenStudy (perl):

make sure you agree that t = 200/9.81 = 20.3874... s = 20,000 / 9.81 = 2038.74...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Never say never say never. And you seemed pretty calm the whole time haha :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes, agreed :)

OpenStudy (perl):

whew, there is probably a way we could avoid that , though. but you just wanted to double check

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the exact value I got for S looking back is 2038.735983

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh man. Yes I did - couldn't sleep without knowing... but had no idea it was going to blow out into that. I just wouldn't get to sleep if you hadn't come busted it lol!! You are honour the word legend in full haha. THANK SO SOO MUCH. I cant believe it turned into that. Its quite awesome :D

OpenStudy (perl):

:P

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Are you puffed out? haha

OpenStudy (perl):

not many people have the patience to wait for that , you deserve a pat on the back too

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You're too kind - I love it :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I just have such a long way to go - which I don't mind as long as I don't get throttled along the way ;)

OpenStudy (perl):

i like to check results myself for consistency. its a good feeling but we should do this problem abstractly, see if it simplifies

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ps i was taking grabs of many of the equations as they evolved so I can later study your approach /problem solving techniques. I hope thats ok with you!?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It sounds interesting but beyond me - I dont know that way..?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the way it came up in the first place (trying to form that formula) was trying to have a back-up plan for solving for t, pretty much. t is not around as much heh

OpenStudy (anonymous):

more of a cross checking tool

OpenStudy (perl):

basically all we did was

OpenStudy (perl):

we went in a circle

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but made it back again - thats the impressive bit. My circles dont finish up being round - or joining at the end lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

turned left at albekurky

OpenStudy (perl):

Assume we know \( \Large \rm a, v, v_o \) $$ \Large \rm{ v = v_0 + at\\~\\ \\t = \color{blue}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \\ \\ s = v_ot + \frac{at^2}{2}\\ \\ \Rightarrow substitute\\~\\ \\ s = v_o \left( \color{red}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \right) + \frac{a \left( \color{red}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \right)^2}{2}\\ } $$

OpenStudy (perl):

lets simplify that expression

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hang on please, im still trying to see how you got the blue step from the red step above...

OpenStudy (perl):

we can do that separately (i used a computer)

OpenStudy (perl):

lets assume thats true, and we can go back to it

OpenStudy (anonymous):

where did the 'a' on the numerator side of the fraction disappear to?

OpenStudy (perl):

Assume we know \( \Large \rm a, v, v_o \) $$ \Large \rm{ v = v_0 + at\\~\\ \\t = \color{blue}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \\ \\ s = v_ot + \frac{at^2}{2}\\ \\ \Rightarrow substitute\\ \\ s = v_o \left( \color{red}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \right) + \frac{a \left( \color{red}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \right)^2}{2} = \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{v^2-v_o^2}{a} } \\~~\\ Now ~solve ~for~ t \\ s = v_ot + \frac{at^2}{2}\\ \\ 2s = 2v_ot + at^2 \\ 0 = at^2 + 2v_o t - 2s \\ \\ t = \frac{-2v_o \pm \sqrt{ (2v_o)^2 - 4a (-2s)} } {2a} \\~\\ ~~\\ Now ~plug~ in~ s\\ \\ t = \frac{-2v_o \pm \sqrt{ (2v_o)^2 - 4a (-2\cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{v^2-v_o^2}{a} })} } {2a} \\~\\= \frac{-2v_o \pm \sqrt{ (2v_o)^2 - 4\cancel a (-\cancel 2\cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\cancel 2} \cdot \frac{v^2-v_o^2}{\cancel a} })} } {2 a} \\~\\ = \frac{-2v_o \pm \sqrt{ (2v_o)^2 - 4 (-1\cdot \color{blue}{(v^2-v_o^2) })} } {2a} \\~\\ = \frac{-2v_o \pm \sqrt{ (2v_o)^2 + 4 ( \color{blue}{v^2-v_o^2})} } {2a} \\~\\ = \frac{-2v_o \pm \sqrt{ 4v_o^2 + 4v^2-4v_o^2} } {2a} \\~\\ = \frac{-2v_o \pm \sqrt{ 4v^2} } {2a} \\~\\ = \frac{-2v_o \pm 2v } {2a} \\~\\ = \frac{-2v_o \pm 2v } {2a} \\ ~\\ =\frac{2 ( -v_0 \pm v) }{2a} \\ ~\\ =\frac{ ( -v_0 \pm v) }{a} }$$

OpenStudy (perl):

and you see we basically get \( \Large \rm t = \frac{( v - v_0 )}{a} \) there are actually two solutions for time, because its a quadratic equation.

OpenStudy (perl):

we get an extraneous solution, in other words

OpenStudy (perl):

$$ \Large \rm{ v = v_0 + at\\~\\ \\t = \color{blue}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \\ \\ s = v_ot + \frac{at^2}{2}\\ \\ \Rightarrow substitute\\ \\ s = v_o \left( \color{red}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \right) + \frac{a \left( \color{red}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \right)^2}{2} = \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{v^2-v_o^2}{a} } \\~~\\ Now ~solve ~for~ t \\ s = v_ot + \frac{at^2}{2}\\ \\ 2s = 2v_ot + at^2 \\ 0 = at^2 + 2v_o t - 2s \\ \\ t = \frac{-2v_o \pm \sqrt{ (2v_o)^2 - 4a (-2s)} } {2a} \\~\\ ~~\\ Now ~plug~ in~ s\\ \\ t = \frac{-2v_o \pm \sqrt{ (2v_o)^2 - 4a (-2\cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{v^2-v_o^2}{a} })} } {2a} \\~\\= \frac{-2v_o \pm \sqrt{ (2v_o)^2 - 4\cancel a (-\cancel 2\cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\cancel 2} \cdot \frac{v^2-v_o^2}{\cancel a} })} } {2 a} \\~\\ = \frac{-2v_o \pm \sqrt{ (2v_o)^2 - 4 (-1\cdot \color{blue}{(v^2-v_o^2) })} } {2a} \\~\\ = \frac{-2v_o \pm \sqrt{ (2v_o)^2 + 4 ( \color{blue}{v^2-v_o^2})} } {2a} \\~\\ = \frac{-2v_o \pm \sqrt{ 4v_o^2 + 4v^2-4v_o^2} } {2a} \\~\\ = \frac{-2v_o \pm \sqrt{ 4v^2} } {2a} \\~\\ = \frac{-2v_o \pm 2v } {2a} \\ ~\\ =\frac{2 ( -v_0 \pm v) }{2a} \\ ~\\ =\frac{ ( -v_0 \pm v) }{a} \\ ~\\ =\frac{ (\pm v -v_0 ) }{a} \\ \therefore \\ t = \frac{ (v -v_0 ) }{a} ~, ~ t = \frac{ (-v -v_0 ) }{a} \\the~ latter~ solution ~is~ extraneous \\ because ~ it ~ does~ not~ satisfy ~ v = v_0 + at } $$

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sorry to but in the formula you want is average speed times (time) 200/2(20.4)=2040 as you had

OpenStudy (perl):

i just wanted to demonstrate that we are 'going in circles'

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hey perl, I gotta go get ready fro work - night shift, Im loathed to leave but I gotta do it, Im cutting it fine as it is. Thank you so so so sooooo much for taking this on and being so good with me :) I owe you one - somehow, im not sure cause you're kind of on top of math heh :) I will be studying and contemplating this for the next foreseeable future lol but seriously, THANK YOU :)

OpenStudy (perl):

Your welcome :)

OpenStudy (perl):

I will leave a challenge problem for you , a step in the proof. Show that left side equals right side, hint start from the left side cancel or expand , avoid expanding if not necessary : $$ \Large \rm v_o \left( \color{red}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \right) + \frac{a \left( \color{red}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \right)^2}{2} = \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{v^2-v_o^2}{a} } $$

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok cool. Thank you, leave it with me (for a while please) I hope I can manage it. I will definitely give it my best and hopefully pull it off :) Thanks for the hints too ! ok I better run, have an awesome night :) :)

OpenStudy (perl):

$$ \Large \rm {v_o \left( \color{red}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \right) + \frac{a \left( \color{red}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \right)^2}{2} \\= v_o \left( \color{red}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \right) + \frac{a \color{red}{\frac{(v-v_o)^2 }{a^2 }}}{2} \\= v_o \left( \color{red}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \right) + \frac{ \color{red}{\frac{(v-v_o)^2 }{a }}}{2} \\= v_o \left( \color{red}{\frac{v-v_o }{a}} \right) + \frac{ \color{red}{(v-v_o)^2 }}{2a} \\= \frac{2}{2}\cdot \frac{v_o (v-v_o) }{a } + \frac{ \color{red}{(v-v_o)^2 }}{2a} \\= \frac{2v_o (v-v_o) }{2a } + \frac{ \color{red}{(v-v_o)^2 }}{2a} \\= \frac{2v_o (v-v_o) }{2a } + \frac{ \color{red}{(v-v_o)^2 }}{2a} \\= \frac{2v_o (v-v_o) + (v-v_o)^2}{2a } \\~\\ factor ~out~ v-v_o\\~\\ \\= \frac{(v-v_o) [ 2v_o + (v-v_o)]}{2a } \\~\\= \frac{(v-v_o) [ 2v_o + v-v_o]}{2a } \\~\\= \frac{(v-v_o) [ v_o + v]}{2a } \\~\\= \frac{(v-v_o) [ v + v_o]}{2a } \\~\\ = \frac{v^2 - v_o v + v_o v - v_o^2}{2a} \\~\\ = \frac{v^2 - v_o^2}{2a} } $$

OpenStudy (perl):

sorry i couldn't resist :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Haha you'r so funny :D Awesome - thanks ha, thanks you :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!