Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 13 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

will medal + fan!! please help!!! Bradley and Kelly are out flying kites at a park one afternoon. A model of Bradley and Kelly's kites are shown below on the coordinate plane as kites BRAD and KELY, respectively:

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Which statement is correct about the two kites? A. They are not similar because segment BR to segment KE is 1:2 and segment KY to segment BD is 2:1. B. They are similar because segment BR to segment KY is 1:2 and segment BD to segment YL is 1:2. C. They are not similar because segment YL to segment DA is 1:2 and segment KY to segment BD is 2:1. D. They are similar because segment KY to segment BD is 2:1 and segment YL to segment DA is 2:1.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@dan815

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@perl

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@TuringTest pls help me out D:

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@texaschic101

OpenStudy (turingtest):

let's try out the different possibilities: "They are not similar because segment BR to segment KE is 1:2 and segment KY to segment BD is 2:1." Let's look at those segments http://prntscr.com/6sg0fi If these two pairs of segments are similar, is that enough to show the kites are similar?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes i think

OpenStudy (turingtest):

think about how the other half of the figure could be different if we don't check it http://prntscr.com/6sg2tm are these two figures similar?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no, i dont think so

OpenStudy (turingtest):

correct, so this means that showing BR to segment KE (the red sides) are 1:2 and segment KY to segment BD (the blue sides) are 2:1 is not enough to prove similarity of the whole shape

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohhhh

OpenStudy (turingtest):

yep, so we can check the next possible answer...

OpenStudy (turingtest):

They are similar because segment BR to segment KY is 1:2 and segment BD to segment YL is 1:2. Well let's mark those segments like we did last time, with BR and KY in red, and BD and YL in blue

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay. i can do that in my head

OpenStudy (turingtest):

ok, if those sides are similar, is that enough to prove the whole shape is similar?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sorry i was gone for a while i had to do something

OpenStudy (turingtest):

that's ok

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hmm no

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i dont think the 2nd one is right either

OpenStudy (turingtest):

correct, the 2nd one is no better than the first, it's just flipped

OpenStudy (turingtest):

how about the third?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i think that ones wrong too

OpenStudy (turingtest):

why?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well it only includes 2 segments and i thought you have to include more to find out if its similar

OpenStudy (anonymous):

idk if that makes sense

OpenStudy (turingtest):

Yes it makes sense, but think about another example like a square if you have two rectangles, all you need to determine if they are similar is two sides. If two of the sides are similar, and a third is not, both the shapes can't possibly be rectangles. If that makes any sense.

OpenStudy (turingtest):

so in this example we are looking at these sides http://prntscr.com/6sganu

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah that makes sense

OpenStudy (turingtest):

see, if I alter the other sides, it's not a kite anymore: http://prntscr.com/6sgck7

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right right..

OpenStudy (turingtest):

so now we have to check if the statement is even true "segment YL to segment DA is 1:2" is that true?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

im not sure. how do you exactly find out the ratio part??

OpenStudy (turingtest):

well if YL:DA is 1:2, which segment should be longer?

OpenStudy (turingtest):

I am trying to help you find the answer in fewer steps than it would take to calculate everything. Think about things to check that require the least work.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay. thank you for that by the way

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and segment YL is the longer one

OpenStudy (turingtest):

right, so is YL:DA in ratio 1:2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no, it should be 2:1 right? because YL is longer

OpenStudy (turingtest):

correct, so this answer makes no sense since it's not true

OpenStudy (turingtest):

so by process of elimination we should have our answer, although it is best to check

OpenStudy (anonymous):

how do you check it?

OpenStudy (turingtest):

in order of least to most work: check that the statement would imply similarity check that the statement is true from a glance calculate the lengths of the sides to verify that the statement is true (I actually have a slightly different way to do the last step)

OpenStudy (turingtest):

the first two answers were wrong because they would not have implied similarity the third answer was wrong because you could tell it wasn't true by just looking at the figure

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay that makes sense!!!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

tysm you helped me so much

OpenStudy (turingtest):

you are welcome!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!