will medal + fan!! please help!!! Bradley and Kelly are out flying kites at a park one afternoon. A model of Bradley and Kelly's kites are shown below on the coordinate plane as kites BRAD and KELY, respectively:
Which statement is correct about the two kites? A. They are not similar because segment BR to segment KE is 1:2 and segment KY to segment BD is 2:1. B. They are similar because segment BR to segment KY is 1:2 and segment BD to segment YL is 1:2. C. They are not similar because segment YL to segment DA is 1:2 and segment KY to segment BD is 2:1. D. They are similar because segment KY to segment BD is 2:1 and segment YL to segment DA is 2:1.
@dan815
@perl
@TuringTest pls help me out D:
@texaschic101
let's try out the different possibilities: "They are not similar because segment BR to segment KE is 1:2 and segment KY to segment BD is 2:1." Let's look at those segments http://prntscr.com/6sg0fi If these two pairs of segments are similar, is that enough to show the kites are similar?
yes i think
think about how the other half of the figure could be different if we don't check it http://prntscr.com/6sg2tm are these two figures similar?
no, i dont think so
correct, so this means that showing BR to segment KE (the red sides) are 1:2 and segment KY to segment BD (the blue sides) are 2:1 is not enough to prove similarity of the whole shape
ohhhh
yep, so we can check the next possible answer...
They are similar because segment BR to segment KY is 1:2 and segment BD to segment YL is 1:2. Well let's mark those segments like we did last time, with BR and KY in red, and BD and YL in blue
okay. i can do that in my head
ok, if those sides are similar, is that enough to prove the whole shape is similar?
sorry i was gone for a while i had to do something
that's ok
hmm no
i dont think the 2nd one is right either
correct, the 2nd one is no better than the first, it's just flipped
how about the third?
i think that ones wrong too
why?
well it only includes 2 segments and i thought you have to include more to find out if its similar
idk if that makes sense
Yes it makes sense, but think about another example like a square if you have two rectangles, all you need to determine if they are similar is two sides. If two of the sides are similar, and a third is not, both the shapes can't possibly be rectangles. If that makes any sense.
yeah that makes sense
see, if I alter the other sides, it's not a kite anymore: http://prntscr.com/6sgck7
right right..
so now we have to check if the statement is even true "segment YL to segment DA is 1:2" is that true?
im not sure. how do you exactly find out the ratio part??
well if YL:DA is 1:2, which segment should be longer?
I am trying to help you find the answer in fewer steps than it would take to calculate everything. Think about things to check that require the least work.
okay. thank you for that by the way
and segment YL is the longer one
right, so is YL:DA in ratio 1:2
no, it should be 2:1 right? because YL is longer
correct, so this answer makes no sense since it's not true
so by process of elimination we should have our answer, although it is best to check
how do you check it?
in order of least to most work: check that the statement would imply similarity check that the statement is true from a glance calculate the lengths of the sides to verify that the statement is true (I actually have a slightly different way to do the last step)
the first two answers were wrong because they would not have implied similarity the third answer was wrong because you could tell it wasn't true by just looking at the figure
okay that makes sense!!!
tysm you helped me so much
you are welcome!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!