Can someone explain the babylonian method to me
method for what ....
for estamating squaroots
oh, well tell me what your thoughts about it are, or where it loses you at. in the mean time ill refresh my history of math memorys and chime in
im on square 1
basically nothing
you got a specific sqrt you want to determine?
lets see 130
sqrt(130) ... now take a guess
10
ok now take the average of 10 and 130/10
add them together and divide by 2?
yep .. in the mean time ill try to math some evidence for it
\[\sqrt{n}=g+E\] \[n=g^2+2gE+E^2\] \[\frac{n}{g}=g+2E+\frac{E^2}{g}\] \[g+\frac{n}{g}=2g+2E+\frac{E^2}{g}\] \[\frac{g+\frac{n}{g}}{2}=g+E+\frac{E^2}{2g}\] when the error is small enough, g is a good approximation in fact if E=0, our guess is exact
so you plug you estamtion in g
you plug your 'guess' in for g yes
and E?
the formula creates a new 'guess' that can be refined even further E is just some error, since we are not exact then g+E = n for some Error E the smaller we get E the colser we get to the sqrt
oh
we can solve a quadratic for E :)
\[\sqrt{130}=10+E\]
so like that
yes
square both sides
the babylon way is just using the average of g and n/g the rest of it is just playing about with math
so to find the average |dw:1428870995402:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!