\[\large [3;6,\overline{1,4}] = 3+\dfrac{1}{6+\dfrac{1}{1+\dfrac{1}{4 + \dfrac{1}{1+\dfrac{1}{4+\cdots}}}}} =?\]
\[{{\dfrac{1}{4 + \dfrac{1}{1+\dfrac{1}{4+\cdots}}}}} := ~ ~ t \] \[{{{4 + \dfrac{1}{1+\dfrac{1}{4+\cdots}}}}} = ~ ~ \frac{1}{t}\] \[{{{ \dfrac{1}{1+\dfrac{1}{4+\cdots}}}}} =\frac{1}{t} - 4 = t\]And so,\[1 - 4t = t^2\Rightarrow t^2 + 4t-1 =0 \Rightarrow t = \sqrt{5} - 2 \]
Half of our job is done.
\[3 + \frac{1}{6+t} = 3 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{5} + 4 }\]
Neat !
Is there some sort of trick when it comes to continuous fractions like these? Because I'm pretty sure what I showed above is just a standard-old-boring kind of solution.
why didn't u let \[1+{{\dfrac{1}{4 + \dfrac{1}{1+\dfrac{1}{4+\cdots}}}}} := ~ ~ t\]
these continued fractions always converge to an irrational number
yeah they always converge
is this correct? $$ \large {{{ \dfrac{1}{\color{red}1+\dfrac{1}{4+\cdots}}}}} =\frac{1}{t} - 4 = t $$
Well, I suppose we could've done that, and substituted\[\frac{1}{6 + \frac{1}{t}}\] in the end.
why is that equal to t, when t had a 4
Ah, I read the fraction wrong.
Thanks for pointing out. Let's make the modifications.\[{{{ \dfrac{1}{1+\dfrac{1}{4+\cdots}}}}} =\frac{1}{t} - 4 \]\[\dfrac{1}{1 + t} = \frac{1}{t} - 4\]I hope I'm right this time.
\[t = t+1 - 4t(t+1)\]\[4t^2 + 4t -1=0\]
\[t = \frac{\sqrt 2 -1}{2}\]
im getting the same..
looks good now :)
\[\large [3;6,\overline{1,4}] = 3+\dfrac{1}{6+\dfrac{1}{1+\dfrac{1}{4 + \dfrac{1}{1+\dfrac{1}{4+\cdots}}}}} = 3+\dfrac{1}{6+\dfrac{1}{1+t}}\]
should end up with \[\dfrac{14-\sqrt{2}}{4}\]
the reverse of this problem is more interesting : represent \(\sqrt{2}\) as infinite continued fraction
there seems to be a nice method to write any irrational number as a continued fraction \[\sqrt{2} = [1;\overline{2}]=1+\dfrac{1}{2+\dfrac{1}{2+\cdots}}\]
The continued fraction of \(\sqrt[3]{2}\), on the other hand, doesn't really seem to help.
It's like an "irrational" continued fraction expansion, y'know.
i mean the terms in continued fraction form dont seem to be periodic
wolfram seem to know how to work these continued fraction forms quickly !
this doesnt look periodic too http://gyazo.com/0c07cf4c190f6f341b9fff30c33ea2b9
Yeah, I can understand that since \(\pi \) isn't algebraic.
\(e\) has some pattern to it though
Surprising...
\[e = [2;\overline{1,2n,1}]\] where \(n=1,2,3,\ldots\)
its not exactly periodic but it has that surprising pattern !
and phi has a very nice pattern
very simple i mean
what is the continued fraction for cube root of 2
\(\sqrt[3]{2}\) doesn't look periodic http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=continued+fraction+2%5E%281%2F3%29
may be not all irrational numbers are periodic in contined fraction representation
right, but at least the square root of integers are
\[\phi = [1;\overline{1}] = 1+\dfrac{1}{1+\dfrac{1}{1+\cdots}}\] i think this is the most nice looking continued fraction
yes its surprising, and e is nice as well
interesting.. is it easy to prove square roots of integers are periodic in continued fraction representation
all the examples i saw so far are periodic
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!