Which was not a reason for the decentralization of Japan that occurred during the 1300s and 1400s? increased power of the daimyo decline of imperial authority success of the Mongol invasion rise of the samurai warrior elite
Decentralization (or decentralisation) is the process of redistributing or dispersing functions, powers, people or things away from a central location or authority. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralization
Yes, I know that. But I'm not sure what caused decentralization in Japan. I can't find it in the textbook: http://heuta.com/K12Content/Courses/resources/swfs/media/Twelfth_Grade/History/Unit22161/Lesson87171/AP_WOR_S2_08_07.pdf
You can eliminate one for sure.
"Ultimately, Japan’s decentralization resulted in a series of destructive civil wars, in which local lords battled each other with armies of well-trained warrior elites called samurai."
Which was NOT a reason -- this is the part that is really confusing me
It's not D, right?
I'm not sure.
Which can we eliminate "for sure"?
According to wikipedia it says the Mongol invasions of Japan were unsuccessful.
So I think the Mongol invasions would not be a reason.
\(\color{blue}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @confluxepic So I think the Mongol invasions would not be a reason. \(\color{blue}{\text{End of Quote}}\) Read the question again.
Which was NOT a reason for the decentralization of Japan that occurred during the 1300s and 1400s?
I think the answer is C
I think the same.
Ok, I'll let you know if it's right. Thanks.
No problem.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!