If a series converges absolutely, does that impact its interval of convergence?
I have a question that is asking me to prove that a series converges for all x, but it has negative terms so I can only prove absolute convergence. So that is why I am asking this question
absolute convergence is stronger than conditional convergence
so yes
We didn't really get into all of the details of what conditional convergence was today
Is it possible for a series to converge for all x if it converges absolutely?
means not absolute convergence simple example \[\sum\frac{1}{n}\] does not converge but \[\sum(-1)^n\frac{1}{n}\] does
not sure what you mean exactly you got an example?
Yes. I am supposed to use a comparison test to show that \[\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{ x ^{3n} }{ 2n!+1 }\] converges for all x
the terms look positive to me
How?
x could be negative
not sure how you use a comparison test for series, usually use the ratio test
I think that counts
But my point is that x could be negative
in any case it is clear that the radius of convergence is \(\infty\)
if x is negative, the terms could be negative
oh of course x could be negative, but it is a fixed number, it does not change say \(x=-10\) for example
If x is negative and n is odd, terms are negative
the idea is to compute \[\lim_{n\to \infty}|\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}|\]
then figure out which \(x\) values work, i.e make sure that ratio is less than one
Yes, but you can't use the ratio test in the first place if there are negative terms... or so I thought. Then you can only use it for absolute convergence
ok i see you are a bid confused here n goes to infinity, x is a variable, but it is fixed as in \(f(x)=\frac{1}{1-x}\) which is equal to \(f(x)=\sum x^n\) if \(-1<x<1\)
in that example x could be negative, for example it could be \(-\frac{1}{2}\)
But 1/(1-x) didn't have a stipulation against negative terms
when you use the ratio test you are taking the absolute value of the terms, computing the limit, then deciding for which values of x the limit exists
But my teacher said that you can't use the ratio test in the first place if you can have negative terms T_T
ok lets take it slow you are confusing the ratio test for seeing if a sum converges, like say \[\sum\frac{1}{n^2}\]
with checking for the radius of convergence of \[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{x^n}{n^2}\]
I have no idea
Although I can't find any part of my book saying anything against negative terms for the ratio test, but it does talk about absolute convergence
i see to find the radius of convergence of \[\sum c_nx^n\] put \(a_n=c_nx^n\) and compute \[\lim_{n\to \infty}|\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}|\]
your answer will have an \(x\) in it
So there are NO stipulations on the interval of convergence if it converges absolutely?
then make sure \[\lim_{n\to \infty}|\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}|<1\]which will depend on \(x\) that is the radius of convergence
if what converges absolutely?
If the series does
It says that the ratio test is a tool to check for absolute convergence
i think i an unable to explain this, it seems you have confused a sum, a number, like \[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^n}\] with a series that looks like \[f(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}x^n\]
I just want to know that if it is possible for something to converge absolutely and converge for all x
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!