Just need this one checked. Solve \[y'''-2y'+y=te^t\] Char eq. \[r^3-2r+1=0\]\[(r-1)(r^2+r-1)=0\]\[r=1,~-.5(1+\sqrt 5),~ .5(\sqrt 5-1)\]
then my homogeneous solution is\[ y= c_1e^t+c_2e^{-.5t(1+\sqrt 5)}+c_3e^{.5t(\sqrt5-1)}\]
Do you agree to this point?
use undetermined coeff of variation of paramets for the particular solution
or* variation of parameters
but do you agree to that point?
I din't muff anything up through there?
ok, so for MOUC \(y_p(t)=(t-1)e^t\)
yea?
@amistre64 do you mind checking this one so far?
Apparently I am wrong
the partiticular sln should be of the form (At^2+Bt)e^t
\[y'''-2y'+y=te^t\] \[(e^{rx})'''-2(e^{rx})'+(e^{rx})=0\] \[r^3(e^{rx})-2r(e^{rx})+(e^{rx})=0\] \[r^3-2r+1=0\] \[r=1,\frac12(-1\pm\sqrt{5}) \] \[y_h=c_0exp(x)+c_1exp(\frac{-1-\sqrt{5}}{2}x)+c_2exp(\frac{-1+\sqrt{5}}{2}x)\]
x .. t... meh
it's ok,
I got what you meant
ever work a wronskian?
yea, but I don't have two solutions
ohhhhhhhH!H!!H!HH!H!!HH!H!!
you have a degree 3 and 3 soluitions
ce^t and ce^{.5(sqrt5-1)t
that just skipped over my head. That will be faster. Variation of parameters it is
thanks!
itll be a 3x4 matrix i believe. good luck :)
nah, we only need two of em
right?
my memory says no. if we has a 2nd order y'' then 2 yes we have a y''' order so its a 3x3 setup
we have 3 linearly independant terms in the homogenous
ew. Then I feel MOUC would be better in this instance
you dont know the 3x3 determinant shortcut? pretty much reduces to the 2x2 shortcut in a way; multiplicaiton of diags
I know, but it's not pretty and a mess to integrate
ok, ive just never come across MOUS before so i wouldnt know how that operates
method of undertermined coefficients
http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/UndeterminedCoefficients.aspx
i call that variation of parameters ... of course my vocab in this area migh tbe rusty
variation of parameters uses integrals and wronskian
the answer to this is ridiculous
\[y_p=Af+Bg+Ch\] \[y'_p=Af'+Bg'+Ch'+(A'f+B'g+C'h:=0)\] \[y''_p=Af''+Bg''+Ch''+(A'f'+B'g'+C'h':=0)\] \[y'''_p=Af'''+Bg'''+Ch'''+(A'f''+B'g''+C'h'':=te^t)\] waaaaiiiittt a minute, we have constant coefficients so isnt this a bit much for it? even tho this should still pan out ...
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y%E2%80%B2%E2%80%B2%E2%80%B2%E2%88%922y%E2%80%B2%2By%3Dt+e%5Et looks fine to me
With initial conditions
i just pooed myself :) Laplace transform maybe? since we have all those ynots
that may work better
that will work better :D
you didnt include the IVP stuff to start with or i might have suggested that ... well about the same time but still...
well, I shall do it now
so \[L(y)=\frac{1}{(s-1)^2(s^3-2s+1)}\]
yea?
so then \[L(t)=\frac{1}{(s-1)^3} *\frac{1}{s^2+s-1} \]
\[s^3 L\{y\}+L\{y\}-2sL\{y\}=\frac{1}{(s-1)^2}\]
you seem to be doing fine :)
My issue is how to do the inverse L(t)
complete the squuare on the s^2+s+1 .... and i think your going to decomp into a sum of fraction right?
uhm, I know the roots of that, but the issue is how do I do the inverse L(t) for 3 things multiplied together
like this is the final answer http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=inverse+Laplace+transform+%281%2F%5B%28s-1%29%5E3%28s%5E2%2Bs-1%29%5D%29
thats definiantly a better siplification than the other output
yea, but how do I get it....
\[\frac{1}{(s-1)^3(s^2+s+1)}=\frac{As^2+Bs+C}{(s-1)^3}+\frac{Ms+N}{(s^2+s+1)}\]
ah
thank you
yw
I got it from here now
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!