Medal The frequency polygon below shows the approximate numbers of runners in the 2008 Boston Marathon to finish in each of the given time slots (times are given in hours and minutes). Find the approximate number of marathoners who finished with times of more than 4 1/2hours. ?marathoners
anyone please help me
so what do you think?
i am not sure where to start
please help me
harz360 - still there?
yes
Okay At 4.5 hours 2,000 runners finish At about 5.5 hours 1,000 runners finish and it seems that for each hour, half of that number finish 6.5 hours 500 7.5 hours 250 If you were to add up 2,000 + 1,000 + 500 + 250 + 125 +63 + etc It would equal 4,000
yes i understand
So, I guess that's it right?
yes so the answer is 4,000?
That's what I think. Do you agree FibonacciChick666?
isn't the x axis the clock?
so careful here :)
Yes it's the clock (or elapsed time to be precise)
harz360 - Do I get the medal?
sorry! I didn't get a notification! And, I'm thinking more like 3000 at 4.5hrs
But essentially, because this graph is a bit misleading, we have to interpret what it means first
As wolf did
So you need to find the sum of all the numbers on the graph that are less than the value at 4.5 hours to the final number of finishers. It should be a pretty big number
no i dont think its 3000 because for example if we are looking for the number of marathoners who finished with times of more than 5 hours its 1500 marathoners
What is the value of the graph at 4.5
draw a line up and over to see
also, the graph shows how many people finished at that specific time not the sum of people who finished with more than that amount
yes you right its 3000
thank you
well, that isn't the final answer, you still need to do the summation
np
how would you do summation
I was drawing some grid lines on the graph
well, what is the lowest number of people on the graph that have a time longer than 4.5hrs
lowest number is 1000
You need to look at the points on the graph, not the labelling
lowest is not 1000
use the picture wolf made
its 500
Lowest is 500 - but does that mean that NO ONE took 6 hours or longer?
there we go, so now, you need to add all the numbers between 500 and 3000 if we are to take the graph literally
wolf, it's a math problem of course that's what it means. We can't actually model a realistic situation. That's ludacris****<--sarcasm
Very well - I do know a little about math and even who Leonardo Fibonacci was 1 1 2 3 5 8 13
here are the actual results, http://www.marathonguide.com/results/browse.cfm?MIDD=15080421 and yes, that is the fibonacci sequence. (I wasn't insulting you, I was insulting how math is taught in the US)
so you add up 1 1 1 2 3 5 8 13
"there we go, so now, you need to add all the numbers between 500 and 3000 if we are to take the graph literally" This is what you need to do
Fibonacci - where do you get the 3,000?
34
The value at 4.5hrs since we need more than 4.5 we don't include the actual 3000 that's why we add the numbers between
what class is that from
Should be something like 6-7th grade math If I recall correctly
So, as I said, we will add 2,000 + 1,000 + 500 then I said to figure out anyone longer than that
You skipped a bunch of values, and we start at 2999
I skipped a bunch of values? Where?
We need to start with the 4.5-5 hour category, not the 5hr
this math is from grade 7
what are all the values?
Well I'm leaving
ok
@FibonacciChick666 can you at least help me then
like I said, you need to add up how many people finished between 4.5 hrs to the end
4000 + 7500 + 6500+3000 m i right?
where did you get those numbers from?
sorry 3 hours =5500
why are you looking at 3 hours?
u said look between 4.5
I fail to see how that means 3, which is less than 4.5
sorry its 2000
m i right?
no, it is the same as this one. Follow the same approach http://openstudy.com/study#/updates/547147eae4b001ceb26b31d4
okay
if that isn't what you did in class, go with wolf and just add the necessary midpoints(frequencies)
ok i wil try to figure it out tomorow
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!