hypothesis testing?? Someone help me
might need some more information ....
hold on
at my age, time is a luxury ...
LolxD
this is more readable ... the chinese method is not the standard
Okay...
start with stating your null and alternate hypothesis ... whats your efforts?
in order to run tests, we have to define what it is we are testing, and what constitutes acceptance/rejection.
*
Null hypothesis: M=U
Sample mean= population mean
is the mean of the last 9 games higher than the mean of the season is our question lets frame the null with an equality: Ho: mean <= 83 games won the alternative hypothesis is simply the rest of it: Ha: mean > 83
im not sportsy so my interpretation of the question may be faulty lol ... but this is the basis of our testing.
agreed so far?
yes
now, in order to test this stuff, we need to know the means ... what is our sample mean?
83
our sample mean is not 83 sum of the data, divided by how many datapoints there are. its close to 83 ... but i did not get 83 for the sample mean
84
9 seasons, # of wins: 89, 95, 95, 96, 86, 9, 98, 95, 93 mean is 84, good now tell me how you would propose we use this information, ill correct you if need be.
we would use the z test
ok, do you know why we would use z and not t? or should we use t instead?
Because we use the z test when we have the population standard deviation
sounds fair enough :) and we want two z scores, a critical value, and the value of the test statistic. the critical value establishes a boundary for the rejection/acceptance regions; and the actual value of the test statistic tells us which side of the boundary we are on. whats our critical value? (itll be associated with the significance level)
do you work this with p-value or critical value? either way is sufficient
mostly the p-value
ok, then with p-value we are comparing the size of alpha with the probability value of the test statistic. i always found it simpler to compare the z scores and not their associated probabilities. why look up what the z relates to when its simple enough to compare zs eh
critical z score would be 1.645 if the z for the test stat is higher then this then we know we are "greater than" and in our rejection region. calculate the test stat for me. how would you work it? (formula)
wait don't we have to do the z test first before doing the p value
we have to find the related z score yes
since alpha = .05 ... and is right tailed (Ha > 83) our left tail area is .9500, which relates to a critical z score of 1.645 ... but this information is pointless if comparing the p-value. we still need the test stats z value
i don't know how to do the z test. I always mix the numbers up
z = (sample mean) - (hypot mean) -------------------------- (pop sd) / sqrt(sample size)
84-83 = 1 sqrt(9)/16 = 3/16
1/(a/b) = b/a if that confused you
so N=9
yes, we have a sample of the last 9 seasons that we took the mean of
what about the 110? Where does that fall into
extra information that does noting for us id assume
the population size is 110 ... has nothing to do with the hypothesis testing. at least not in any of the courses i took.
okay
as an answer i got 0.188
me too if we were comparing z scores rejection region ------------|-------------------------> 0.188 1.645 we are clearly not in the rejection region; and your p-value will be bigger then .05
We retain the null hypothesis
we fail to reject it is what i always refered to it as. but yeah
P(z>3/16) = .4256 since alpha = .0500 you see how the p-value is working out
how did you got the p-value? And this question is a Type 2 error
P(z>3/16) of course
z = 3/16 = 0.1875 normalCDF(0.1875, 9999, 0, 1) is one method or looking up a table to find row -0.1 and col 0.08 if its left tailed etc etc ....
how would you find the area related to the right side of z=0.1875 ?
|dw:1429976782097:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!