which follow these converge? Also calculate 1. F0 = F1 = 1, and Fn + 1 = Fn + Fn-1 2. a1 = 2 and a n + 1 = (to) ^ (1/2) 3. A0 = 1 and an + 1 = an + m ^ n for every m∈R
the first is Fibonacci in recurrence formula
haha go sleep at any rate how do you decide convergence?
yes diverge since the ratio goes to psi which greater than 1
psi=golden mean
hmm ya you can say increasing without bound
limit is another way to go at it, that's i asked what does the asker know about convergence
haha ya, i never memorized
hmm well good that you mentioned boundness
okay!
hmm lets the same way loser did the first a1=2 a2=root2 a3=root (root2) so is this bounded or not
what language is that problem was written?
Deutsch
hmm i see. what level of mathematics are you doing?
see that our terms are getting closer and closer to zero yes 2>root2>root(root(2))>...........
so a_n+1<=a_n and bounded therefore converges
sorry , i do not speaking well english .. I am in my first year at the college
oh i see, no problem but you understand the math yes
\[a_1=2\\a_2=\sqrt{2}\\a_3=\sqrt{\sqrt{2}}\\.\\.\\.\\a_{n+1}=\sqrt{a_{n}}\] note that \[a_{n+1}\leq a_n\] and \[a_n \] is bounded so it must converges
hmm there is little problem @perl the sequence is not non increasing yes?
not non increasing means decreasing?
not really isn't non increasing assume that terms might equal
we have a sequence $$ \LARGE 2, 2^{\frac 12}, 2^{\frac14},2^{\frac 18},.. 2^{\frac 1{2^{n}}},... $$
that's my question this sequence is strictly decreasing
right
it is bounded above by 2, bounded below by 0 (or 1), and it is monotonic therefore there exists a greatest lower bound
and that is the limit of the sequence
it is bounded below by zero since all the terms in the sequence are positive
and bounded above by 2 since it is decreasing, and 2 is the first term
we have a sequence $$ \LARGE 2 \geq 2^{\frac 12} \geq 2^{\frac14} \geq 2^{\frac 18},.. \geq2^{\frac 1{2^{n}}},... $$
yeah i wanted to use boundness theorem but i thought it has to be nonincreasing
In the mathematical field of real analysis, the monotone convergence theorem is any of a number of related theorems proving the convergence of monotonic sequences (sequences that are increasing or decreasing) that are also bounded. Informally, the theorems state that if a sequence is increasing and bounded above by a supremum, then the sequence will converge to the supremum; in the same way, if a sequence is decreasing and is bounded below by an infimum, it will converge to the infimum http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotone_convergence_theorem
\(\color{blue}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @xapproachesinfinity see that our terms are getting closer and closer to zero yes 2>root2>root(root(2))>........... \(\color{blue}{\text{End of Quote}}\) that's what i was doing but had doubt
the monotonic sequences convergence theorem does not have to be strictly decreasing or increasing. monotonicity is enough
oh ok
non decreasing (sometimes called increasing) non increasing (sometimes called decreasing) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotonic_function
love your pic by the way , i forgot who you were
okay i see
poincare is awesome haha
watched some videos about math history, this guy is quite something
check nj wilberger math history one of the videos talk about poincare and other mathematicians
so in a nutshell the monotonic sequence theorem says 1. If a sequence of real numbers is strictly increasing (or not decreasing) and bounded above, then its supremum is the limit. 2. If a sequence of real numbers is strictly decreasing (or not increasing) and bounded below, then its infimum is the limit. In our case we use part 2. but we have to show that an+1 < an
show that \( \LARGE 2^{\frac {1}{n+1} } < 2^\frac 1n \)
i see thanks :)
you can show it either by induction or how about raise both sides to the power of n+1
hmm we show that f(x)=1/2^x is decreasing so 2^(1/n+1)<2(1/n)
hmm i went too far induction is good actually
|dw:1430622912646:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!