Question

Which is not a reason World War I has been considered a "total war"? Fighting took place in various parts of the globe. Citizens were called upon to make sacrifices for the war effort. The government was involved with producing and distributing goods. Citizens fully supported the efforts of their respective nations.

Answer 1

A total war means that all of the countries energy is focused on war, based on that, what do you think is the best option?

Answer 2

citizens were called upon to make sacrifices for the war effort?

Answer 3

Well, it is asking what is NOT a reason that it was considered a total war, so which option seems to be opposite of total war

Answer 4

Citizens fully supported the efforts of their respective nations.

Answer 5

I would choose A because it has nothing to do with the definition of "total war"