Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 8 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Please help :3 “Prior to any questioning, the person must be warned that he has a right to remain silent, that any statement he does make may be used as evidence against him, and that he has a right to the presence of an attorney, either retained or appointed.”—Chief Justice Earl Warren in Miranda v. Arizona Because of the ruling in this case, questions officers ask during an arrest cannot be used in court what suspects say when under arrest cannot be used in court suspects under arrest must demand their rights from officers officers must inform suspects under arrest of their rights

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what do you think

OpenStudy (theyankee):

I say simply that officers (being very involved with the law enforcement community) get hung out to dry if they don't 'Marandize' their suspects. Miranda law is the ''right to remain silent spiel.' Its a violation of federal law to use material in court that was obtained BEFORE you read off these rights, and any charges inflicted based upon information obtain before the miranda rights are read will instantly be pardoned :) So I'd personally say D.

OpenStudy (theyankee):

But whatever you think fits that description :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay good i had the same thank you :) @TheYankee

OpenStudy (theyankee):

Anytime ^^

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!