Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 9 Online
OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

Is it geometric?

OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

what is the pattern, can you tell me?

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

take 0.8/1.6 what does it give

OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

It decreases by .2 each time?

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

0.8 - 0.2 = 0.4 ? are you sure it decrease by 0.2 ?

OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

I mean't .4

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

are you adding/subtracting, OR multiplying/dividing ?

OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

Do I go 1.6+0.4 to figure out if it is adding and same for -, x, and /?

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

i already gave you a hint

OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

Divide?

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

yes

OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

So geometric?

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

yes

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

why is it a geometric?

OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

Cause you divide by 0.4 to get the next number

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

hmm not quite

OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

And when you divide or multiply it's geometric.

OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

And if you add or subtract it's arithmetic

OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

Right?

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

see the pattern

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

we are not diving by 0.4

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

Whenever you aren't clear, try to see if there is an equivalent common difference between all of the terms. For geometric sequence: \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle {\rm d}=a_{n+1}-a_n }\) (d, is the difference. IT MUST BE EQUIVALENT BETWEEN ANY TERM AND THE ONE AFTER IT) If the difference isn't always equivalent, then it is not arithmetic. For example in your sequence: \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle {\rm d}=a_{2}-a_{1}=0.8-1.6=-0.8 }\) and, \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle {\rm d}=a_{3}-a_{2}=0.4-0.8=-0.4 }\) So the difference aren't equivalent, and therefore it can't be arithmetic sequence.

OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

Yes. But was I right about what I said above

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

we are dividing by 2 to get the next term

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

yes, geometric is correct

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

in this case))

OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

Okay thank you

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

correct but wrong on the reason we are dividing by 2 not 0.4

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

for geometric sequence (in general), you must have a ratio, or a proportional relationship betwen the terms. \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle {\rm r}=\left(a_{n+1}\right) \div \left(a_{n}\right) }\) for all terms. Such that: \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle {\rm r}=\left(a_{2}\right) \div \left(a_{1}\right)=\left(a_{3}\right) \div \left(a_{2}\right)=\left(a_{4}\right) \div \left(a_{3}\right) =~...~= ~\left(a_{n+1}\right) \div \left(a_{n}\right) }\)

OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

I know! You have done told me..

OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

Okay thank you Solomon

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

after 3 d0ts, it is supposed to be \(\large\color{black}{ ...=\left(a_{n+1}\right) \div \left(a_{n}\right) }\)

OpenStudy (i_love_my_nieces):

I will write that down

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

sure.... or you can find a tutorial online that explains better and in detail

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

or a video.... I think absolutely everyone explained what it is already;) Internet is vast!

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

you welcome...

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!