Calculate the weighted mean of the RORs for each portfolio. Based on the results, which list shows a comparison of the overall performance of the portfolios, from best to worst? Portfolio 1, Portfolio 3, Portfolio 2 Portfolio 2, Portfolio 3, Portfolio 1 Portfolio 3, Portfolio 1, Portfolio 2 Portfolio 3, Portfolio 2, Portfolio 1
Whats ROR ohh rate of return -.-
Yeah, rate of return
what is your concept of a weighted mean?
\[\frac{ax+by+cz+...+nk}{a+b+c+...+n}\]
ah hard to put into words, I watched a presentation on it and understand the basics of it.
do we add up our dollars, or our percentages?
of consider this as: \[\sum x_i~P(x_i)\]
Its the percentage * dollars And i kinda find it intuitive Its the percentage of return or rate of return that we make on a certain sum of money
our excepted rate of return (the mean) is -.009(750) + .042(2570) + .118(1990) -.014(550) +.181(1290)
So we multiply the percentages to each dollar amount, then find the mean of each of those results and compare them?
The percentage * dollar amt is in essence the mean
its the weighted mean
we can work a matrix {{750,2570,1990,550,1290}, {640,870,1480,1410,1275}, {350,595,630,2280,2120}} dot {{-.009},{.042},{.118},{-.014},{.181}} https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%7B%7B750%2C2570%2C1990%2C550%2C1290%7D%2C+%7B640%2C870%2C1480%2C1410%2C1275%7D%2C+%7B350%2C595%2C630%2C2280%2C2120%7D%7D+dot+%7B%7B-.009%7D%2C%7B.042%7D%2C%7B.118%7D%2C%7B-.014%7D%2C%7B.181%7D%7D
So the best performing portfolios was 1,3,2?
no, the matrix output is clearly not 1,3,2 as best performing
hmm why not?
I'm confused, what is it if it's not 1,3,2?
Like even if we divide or rate of return by the total dollar value in each portfolio you still result with 1,3,2
hmm, dividing by something ..... i might have seen this askew
nah i made up the dividing thing ... it was just a random guess
expected return divided by money spent ... seems fair
if we expect 23, after spending 100 what is our ROR?
23%
wait, reading the question is becomeing a chore lol we are given the ROR already, so its just the expected return
LOL Right so why isnt the answer 1,3,2 We make the most return with portfolio 1 then portfolio 3 and then portfolio 2 right?
if our ROR is 23% and we spend 100, then our efforts profit us 23 dollars right?
yea
Port1, we expect to make 561.80 for our investments right? sum of, ROR * ($$) is our expected ROR
tell me the definition of weighted average, make sure im remembering this correctly
OMGGGGGGGG
im sure im missing someting to do with allocations
WE ARE CALCULATING THISS INCORRECTLY
rate of return * weight of asset in portfolio
\[ror*\frac an\] a/n being the weight of the yeah
YEAAA THATS IT!!!!
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=+561.8+%2F%28sum+%7B750%2C2570%2C1990%2C550%2C1290%7D%29%2C+416.455%2F%28+sum+%7B640%2C870%2C1480%2C1410%2C1275%7D%29%2C+447.98%2F%28+sum+%7B350%2C595%2C630%2C2280%2C2120%7D%29 But Its what I did earlier on ..... I just completed it in 2 steps
I divided it by n after we found our return So the answer still remains 1,3,2 ?
yep, my original matrix needs to use unit vectors instead. 1,3,2 is good for me now
@Brad1996 Sorry that im taking over your question .... got a huge exam in 3 weeks so attempting to absorb as much as I can
Ok great @amistre64 Thanks
unit vector is an improper description, but its reminds of a unit vector adjustment, dividing by a length http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%7B%7B750%2F7150%2C2570%2F7150%2C1990%2F7150%2C550%2F7150%2C1290%2F7150%7D%2C+%7B640%2F5675%2C870%2F5675%2C1480%2F5675%2C1410%2F5675%2C1275%2F5675%7D%2C+%7B350%2F5975%2C595%2F5975%2C630%2F5975%2C2280%2F5975%2C2120%2F5975%7D%7D+dot+%7B%7B-.009%7D%2C%7B.042%7D%2C%7B.118%7D%2C%7B-.014%7D%2C%7B.181%7D%7D
so, does any of this help brad understand the problem? i tend to learn best from my own mistakes lol
Scared him off ... oh well
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!