Super confused? Are parallel functions inverse functions? Graph attached
its really throwing me off because there's no curves, it's really hard to tell if it's an inverse function or not...
those functions are not parallel
So they're not inverse functions, I'm assuming as well
those lines are not parallel *
you can test whether they are inverse
how?
check whether it is true that g(f(x)) = x or f(g(x)) = x
I don't know what to plug in for that
It's strange, the two g(x)'s don't match. Did you write in the one in the `plot` box?
f(x) = 3x+2 g(x) = (x-2)/3
@perl I had typed graph, is there a difference between graph and plot?
you need parentheses around g(x) = `(x-2) / 3 `
ahhh I see the error now
one moment
Here's how it properly looks @perl
...I'm still really not sure if this is an inverse function or not, still leaning towards its not though
@zepdrix what do I need to do? I didn't understand perl's explanation
You could try do a composition as he suggested, I think you need a better understanding of functions to do that though. I would recommend starting with f, and applying your inverse steps and then see if it turns into g. Sec, I'll explain.
\[\Large\rm f(x)=3x+2\]We start by calling f(x) y for simplicity,\[\Large\rm y=3x+2\]Switch your y and x's.\[\Large\rm x=3y+2\]Now THIS y represents the inverse function. Solve for this y, get it alone. Do you understand the steps to do so? how to solve for y?
y-2/3=x?
It's hard to tell with the way you wrote it :OC Did you mean \(\Large\rm \frac{y-2}{3}\) or \(\Large\rm y-\frac{2}{3}\) ?
the first one
Ok good! :) But notice I switched the x's and y's. You should have ended up with \(\Large\rm y=\frac{x-2}{3}\)
and that looks like the second function...so they ARE inverse of each other?
Yesss good job! :)
THANKS SO MUCH
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!