Super confusing graph, please help.
I see no difference other than being translated across the X axis, but that's clearly not an option...
*reflected across the x axis
That is a easy graph
first you have to find a graphing calculator
then you have to put it in the graph
translated across the x axis doesn't really make sense in the context of your question. it makes more sense to say reflected in a reflection you can 'flip' a figure about a line of reflection. in a translation you can only move a figure, but you cant flip it
I know you see that +4
what in the world are you confused about
I don't see where the +4 is
That could be the easiest question on earth
|dw:1431673740301:dw|
perl I corrected myself earlier, thank you though
|dw:1431673781382:dw|
oh sorry :)
so how do I find where this mysterious +4 is at?
let me graph this
kk ill wait thanks
first flip the graph about the x axis, then translate it up 4 units
nvm you are it said "from" y=2(3)^x
so perl is right flip it and add 4
So D right
It didn't go across the x-axis
i'm just plain lost now @perl
ok lets do it in steps
do you agree this is reflection about x axis https://www.desmos.com/calculator/woae5aejqf
Yes
The directions of the question are poorly phrased. This is what it should say: "How is the graph of blah blah `transformed` from the graph of blah blah"
not translated
transformations include reflections,translations, rotations, etc, which do not change the shape of the curve or figure
In any case, the steps are : 1. parent function y = 2(3)^x https://www.desmos.com/calculator/jwtdxnbd67 2. reflect about x axis : y = -2(3)^x https://www.desmos.com/calculator/unkedn7ug1 3. now translate it up 4 units : https://www.desmos.com/calculator/7af7p42li9
Okay. I see now. I don't know why that was so difficult for me before. So just to be clear it is D right, up 4 units?
right
thank you so much
The directions of the question are badly written (by the test maker). This is what it should say: `How is the graph of y=-2(3)^x + 4 transformed from the graph of y = 2(3)^x` You can't get that graph simply by translating the parent function, you need a reflection.
so your confusion is warranted
Here is a guide to the type of transformations http://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/transformations.html and translation http://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/translation.html
looks like the y-axis to me
actually this is better, since it is relevant to functions http://www.regentsprep.org/regents/math/algtrig/atp9/funclesson1.htm
that covers the basic type of function transformations, that you will encounter
yea you right
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!