If \(\lim_{a \to \infty} \frac{1}{a} \int_{a}^{\infty} \frac{x^2 + ax+1}{1+x^4} . \tan^{-1} \left(\frac{1}{x}\right) dx \) is equal to \(\frac{\pi^2}{k}\), where \(k \in \mathbb{N}\) equals to ... ?
\[\lim_{a \to \infty} \cfrac{1}{a} \int_{a}^{\infty} \frac{x^2 + ax+1}{1+x^4} . \tan^{-1} \left(\cfrac{1}{x}\right) dx = \cfrac{\pi ^2}{k} \] here is a much better LaTeX for the question.
My bad, the limits of the integral are from 0 to \(\infty\) instead of \(\bf{a}\) to \(\infty\) .
This is what I've done so far, \(\tan^{-1} \left(\cfrac{1}{x}\right) = \cfrac{\pi}{4} \) So, it becomes : \[\lim_{0 \to \infty} \cfrac{1}{a} \int_{a}^{\infty} \frac{x^2 + ax+1}{1+x^4} . \cfrac{\pi}{4} \] Let, \[ I = \cfrac{1}{a} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{x^2 + ax+1}{1+x^4} . \cfrac{\pi}{4} \] \[ I = \cfrac{1}{a} \left[ \int_{0}^{\infty} \cfrac{x^2 + 1}{x^4 + 1} dx + a \int_{0}^{\infty} \cfrac{x dx}{1+x^4} \right] \] I'm not sure how to go on from here.
I do think that there is an application of inverse trigonometric functions. I did have a look at some of the formulas : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_trigonometric_functions But, they don't seem to fit in there. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
How does \(\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)=\frac{\pi}{4}\)? I think you have to evaluate the integral first.
One sec. I guess, I did a mistake. I'll check it out.
Well, we have: \(\tan^{-1} (1/x) + \cot^{-1} x = \pi /2 \) Right?
But where is the \(\cot^{-1}(x)\)?
.
We do have : \(\tan^{-1} (1/x) = \cot^{-1} x \) . So, \(\tan^{-1} (1/x) + \tan^{-1} (1/x) = \pi /2 \) So, it gives \(\tan^{-1} 1/x = \pi /4 \)
But \(\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)=0.463648\neq\frac{\pi}{4}=0.785398\).
Wait, actually I must not have generalized it. There is surely some problem with my point. Let us put x = 1/t We have : \(\tan^{-1} x + \cot^{-1} x = \pi /2 \) \(\cot^{-1} t+ \cot^{-1} 1/t = \pi/2 \) uhmm.. no! I wonder why then my book wrote the integral as : Let \(I = \int_{0}^{\infty} \cfrac{x^2 + ax + 1 }{ 1+x^4} . \tan^{-1} 1/x dx \) Put x = 1/t and adding we get, \[ I = \frac{\pi}{4} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{ (x^2+1)+ax}{1+x^4} dx \]
It also stated : "using \(\tan^{-1}(1/x) + \cot^{-1} x = \pi /2 \) " I'm also confused from where did it get to the above equation.
did you try lhopital ? first you need to show that the expression is in indeterminate form
nvm
it might actually work , but we need to be careful when differentiating with respect to "a" and changing the order of integral and derivative
The lower limit of integration is 0 not a?
\[I = \int_{0}^{\infty} \cfrac{x^2 + ax + 1 }{ 1+x^4} . \tan^{-1}( 1/x)~ dx ~~~\Large{\color{Red}{\star }}\] Let \(x=\dfrac{1}{t}\implies dx = \dfrac{-dt}{t^2}\) \(\Large{\color{Red}{\star }}\) becomes \[\begin{align}I &= \int_{\infty}^0 \cfrac{1/t^2 + a/t + 1 }{ 1+1/t^4} . \tan^{-1} (t)~\frac{-dt}{t^2}\\~\\ &= \int_0^{\infty} \cfrac{t^2+at+1 }{ 1+t^4} . \tan^{-1} (t)~dt\\~\\ &=\int_0^{\infty} \cfrac{x^2+ax+1 }{ 1+x^4} . \tan^{-1} (x)~dx~~~\Large{\color{blue}{\star}} \end{align}\] \(\Large{\color{Red}{\star }} + \Large{\color{blue}{\star }}\) gives \[\begin{align}I+I&=\int_0^{\infty} \cfrac{x^2+ax+1 }{ 1+x^4} . \left(\tan^{-1} (1/x)+\tan^{-1} (x)\right)~dx\\~\\ &=\int_0^{\infty} \cfrac{x^2+ax+1 }{ 1+x^4} . \left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right)~dx\\~\\ \end{align}\]
Need to find the value of the natural number \(k\) @perl
this looks like one of those brilliant problems where the answer "requires" to be an integer between 0 and 999
is the lower limit supposed to be zero
Yes it was fixed later
thanks :)
Find \(k\) in below equation given that \(k\in \mathbb{N}\) \[\lim_{a \to \infty} \cfrac{1}{a} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{x^2 + ax+1}{1+x^4} . \tan^{-1} \left(\cfrac{1}{x}\right) dx = \cfrac{\pi ^2}{k}\]
Yeah thats the complete question
the answer is k = 16
Yes
how in heavens name did you get that?
as pointed out by mathslover earlier, we can evaluate \[\int_0^{\infty} \cfrac{x^2+ax+1 }{ 1+x^4}\,dx\] by splitting like this \[\int_0^{\infty} \cfrac{x^2+1 }{ 1+x^4}\,dx +a\int_0^{\infty} \cfrac{x }{ 1+x^4}\,dx \] @alekos
If we're clever enough, we don't need to evaluate the first integral
second integral evaluates nicely by trivial substitution \(u=x^2\)
I wonder how did we replace t by x before that \(\color{blue}{\star}\) equation ? Shouldn't it be replaced by 1/x too? I know that would give the same equation that we started from but replacing t by x doesn't make sense to me :(
How do you know the first integral is 0?
\[\int_a^bf(t)\,dt = \int_a^bf(x)\,dx\] @mathslover
x or t or something, it doenst matter the variable in definite integral is "dummy"
Oh, I see that! Got that point.
Now, how will we find the integrals (after splitting) ?
@thomas5267 we have \[\int_0^{\infty} \cfrac{x^2+1 }{ 1+x^4}\,dx +a\int_0^{\infty} \cfrac{x }{ 1+x^4}\,dx\] dividing by \(a\) and taking the limit we see that \[\begin{align}\lim\limits_{a\to\infty} \frac{1}{a}\left[\int_0^{\infty} \cfrac{x^2+1 }{ 1+x^4}\,dx +a\int_0^{\infty} \cfrac{x }{ 1+x^4}\,dx\right] &= \lim\limits_{a\to\infty} \frac{1}{a}\left[M+a*N\right] \end{align}\] wher \(M\) and \(N\) are the values of definite integrals
Also we know that both integrals converge(by p-series test), so \(M\) and \(N\) are finite real numbers. Therefore the limit, \(\lim\limits_{a\to\infty}\frac{1}{a}M \) equals \(0\).
Need to work the second integral
i would have tried lhopital straight but i see your textbook method isn't bad..
actually it is pretty neat :) that inverse trig identity was applied very nicely!
Fascinating
Thanks rational
rational how did you go from \[\int\limits_{0}^{\infty} \frac{ t ^{2}+at+1 }{1+t^{4}}\tan^{-1} t dt\] to \[\int\limits_{0}^{\infty} \frac{ x ^{2}+ax+1 }{1+x ^{4}} \tan^{-1} x dx\]
Ahh both give same result as the variable disappears after evaluating definite integral right http://gyazo.com/57f1203c6dd99f5d8ab65be30a72cfb8
yeah I get that. so then the integration limits must be \[\int\limits_{\infty}^{0}\] is that right?
yes i skipped few steps there haha http://gyazo.com/72aa833609fbce9a98dffeb518026ef5
using this property of definite integrals to swap the bounds \[\int\limits_a^b f(t) \,dt~~=~~-\int\limits_b^a f(t) \, dt\]
OK, I see. But then why in the blazes do you add the two integrals? surely this one final integral is sufficient?
that \(\tan^{-1}t\) attached to the integral... is a pain adding both integrals replaces inverse tangent with a simple number : \(\pi/2\)
I agree it is a pain. but how can you add the two and get away with it?
Ohh ok again there were manu steps skipped there... let me add them
\(\Large{\color{Red}{\star }} + \Large{\color{blue}{\star }}\) gives \[\begin{align}I+I&=\int_0^{\infty} \cfrac{x^2+ax+1 }{ 1+x^4} . \color{blue}{\tan^{-1} (1/x)}~dx+\int_0^{\infty} \cfrac{x^2+ax+1 }{ 1+x^4} . \color{blue}{\tan^{-1} (x)} ~dx\\~\\ &=\int_0^{\infty} \cfrac{x^2+ax+1 }{ 1+x^4} . \left(\color{blue}{\tan^{-1} (1/x)+\tan^{-1} (x)}\right)~dx\\~\\ &=\int_0^{\infty} \cfrac{x^2+ax+1 }{ 1+x^4} . \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{2}}\right)~dx\\~\\ \end{align}\]
below is an identity \[\tan^{-1} (1/x)+\tan^{-1} (x) = \frac{\pi}{2}\]
that's fine, I understand all that and thanks for typing it all up. But, why add them in the first place? doesn't seem mathematically correct to me?
why, we're allowed to add two equations right : \[I = \spadesuit\] \[I=\clubsuit\] Adding we get \[I+I =\spadesuit+\clubsuit \]
i see nothing wrong in doing that hmm
so you're adding two integrals in order to solve one integral. I still can't see it?
suppose \[I=2\] and \[I=\sqrt{4}\] then we have \[I+I=2+\sqrt{4}\]
yes!
the main idea behind adding is to use that inverse tangent identity and simplify the overall integral
and then you would have to subtract the final answer by π/4 , would that be right?
yes something like that... i did not conclude the final answer haha
i think we need to divide 2 in the end..
we have \(I+I\) on left hand side which is same as \(2I\) dividing by \(2\) both sides isolates the \(I\) just algebra hyeah
I'm with you now! We are just adding two different forms of the same integral, hence divide by 2 for the final answer to the original integral! Brilliant, thank you.
all done to get rid of that pesky inverse tangent
Exactly! all that circus only to get a simple looking integrand
OK, thanks for going thru that with me. It was bugging me. I'm signing off for now
np good day/night!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!