One pipe can fill a cistern in 3 hours less than the other.The two pipes together can fill the cistern in 6 hours 40 minutes.Find the time each pipe will take to fill the cistern @sepeario
assume the two pipes are x and y. Hence \[x=y+3\] and \[x+y=400\] (I have converted 6hrs 40 minutes into 400 minutes)
Can you use simultaneous equations to solve this?
????????
From the second equation, we can also find that \[x=400-y\]
by rearranging the values, yes?
You can then substitute that value for x into the first equation, leaving only one variable in the equation. This is known as solving through simultaneous equations.
No 6hrs 40 mins will be 6 + 40/60 As per this book :/
Yeah but I like to simplify it into a mixed number.. It's just easier working with that.
Anyway let me complete the equation for you. \[400-y=y+\] and then \[2y=400, y=200\] If y = 200 minutes, then converted back to hours, it is 3 hours and 20 minutes.
It's suppose to be 13 hrs and 15 hrs :/ @perl @Sepeario
12hrs and 15 hrs**
1/x + 1/x-3 = 20/3?? @perl
Never mind, I stuffed up :/
Sorry lol
u mean r^1 and r^2 right??
they are the unknown rates of the pipes
what r subscripts ??????
its a way to label our unknown rates
you can use x and y if you like instead
1 = (2x + 3)(20/3)????
what next explain please
i think we should do this over again
Alright @perl
lets do this carefully
Can't we do 1/x + 1/x-3 = 20/3?
yes that works
i used t, and you used x thats the only difference
Let x and y be the rates of the first and second pipe respectively. One pipe can fill a cistern in 3 hours less than the other. I am going to use : distance = rate * time, but distance is number of cisterns completed (like number of miles completed by a runner) Lets assume the time it takes for the first pipe with rate x to fill one cistern is t. Then the time it takes for the second pipe with rate y is t - 3. 1 cistern = x * t 1 cistern = y * (t - 3) 1 = x*t 1 = y ( t - 3) x = 1/t y = 1/ ( t - 3) Now it says if we have the two pipes working together, they can complete one cistern in 6 and 40/60 hour 1 = ( x + y ) ( 60 + 40/60) substitute 1 = ( 1/t + 1/(t-3) ) ( 60 + 40/60) 1 = ( 1/t + 1/(t-3) ) ( 20/3) 3/20 = 1/t + 1 / (t-3)
1/x + 1/x-3 = 20/3 x-3+x/x^2-3x = 20/3?
20x^2 - 66x + 9 = 0?
That's what I wrote in a comment above. so now?
theres an arithmetic mistake
\(\color{blue}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @AaronAndyson 1/x + 1/x-3 = 20/3 x-3+x/x^2-3x = 20/3? \(\color{blue}{\text{End of Quote}}\) this is wrong it should be 1/x + 1/(x-3) = 3/20
?
your equation is incorrect
correct equation: 1/x + 1/(x-3) = 3/20
1/x + 1/(x-3) = 3/20 multiply both sides by x*(x-3) [x*(x-3)] (1/x + 1/(x-3)] =x*(x-3) 3/20 distribute x*(x-3)*1/x + x(x-3)*1/(x-3) =x*(x-3) 3/20 cancel (x-3) + x = x(x-3) * 3/20 2x -3 = (x^2 -3x) * 3/20 Multiply both sides by 20 20(2x-3) = (x^2 -3x)*3 40x - 60 = 3x^2 - 9x 3x^2 - 9x - 40x + 60 = 0 3x^2 - 49x + 60 = 0 (3x -4) ( x-15) = 0 x = 15, 4/3
"(3x -4) ( x-15) = 0 " How???????????
I factored 3x^2 -49x + 60 = 0
omg, im so good with these, but @perl is better. >.<
Explain the factoring process @perl
I will make that look better for you. I hope Perl will not mind it. :) \[\cfrac{1}{x} + \cfrac{1}{x-3} = \cfrac{3}{20} \\ \cfrac{1}{x} \times x(x-3) + \cfrac{1}{x-3} \times x(x-3) = \cfrac{3(x)(x-3)}{20} \\ x-3 + x = \cfrac{3(x)(x-3)}{20} \\ 2x - 3 = \cfrac{3x(x-3)}{20} \\ (2x -3)(20) = 3x(x-3) \\ 40 x - 60 = 3x^2 -9x \\ 3x^2 -49x + 60 = 0 \\ 3x^2 - 45x - 4x + 60 = 0 \\ 3x(x-15) - 4(x-15) = 0 \\ (3x-4) (x-15) = 0 \\ 3x = 4 \ \text{OR} \ x = 15 \\ x = 4/3 \ \text{OR} \ x = 15 \] Just thought to include LaTeX to make the equations look attractive ;)
3x^2 -49x + 60 = 0 We can break down the middle number -49x , then factor by grouping 3x^2 - 4x -45x + 60 = 0 x( 3x - 4) - 15( 3x - 4) = 0 (3x-4) ( x - 15) = 0
you can also use quadratic formula if you're stumped how to factor the quadratic, or it does not factor at all (that can happen)
And he actually found those numbers by : product of roots should be 3 * 60 = 180 sum of roots should be -49 and so, by guessing the roots, he found the two numbers that satisfy these two conditions are : -45 and -4 :)
Thanks. now I need help with 2 more questions like this one
whats strange about this problem, there are two solutions?
Yes.
oh wait, one of the solutions do not work
we found that x = 15, and x = 4/3 but if you plug in x = 4/3 you get a problem, (a negative rate for the second pipe). so the only solution that works is x = 15
@mathslover \(\color{blue}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @mathslover And he actually found those numbers by : product of roots should be 3 * 60 = 180 sum of roots should be -49 and so, by guessing the roots, he found the two numbers that satisfy these two conditions are : -45 and -4 :) \(\color{blue}{\text{End of Quote}}\) i think theres an issue here. $$ \Large { ax^2 + bx + c = 0 \\~\\ \text{sum of roots } r_1, r_2 \\ r_1\cdot r_2 = \frac{c}{a} \\ r_1 + r_2 = \frac{-b}{a} } $$
what im saying is, the product of the roots is not a*c
Pardon me for that, perl! Didn't get it right. Thanks for pointing it out.
actually this isn't bad, we can go back and derive an interesting result what if we were to do something
\[ \Large { ax^2 + bx + c = 0 \\~\\ \text{sum of roots } r_1, r_2 \\ r_1\cdot r_2 = \frac{c}{a} \\ r_1 + r_2 = \frac{-b}{a} } \] multiply both sides of first equation by a^2, second equation by a \[ \Large { \\ a^2 \cdot r_1\cdot r_2 = a^2 \cdot \frac{c}{a} \\ a \cdot( r_1 + r_2) = a \cdot \frac{-b}{a} }\] now rearrange and simplify \[ \Large { \\ (a \cdot r_1)(a \cdot r_2) = ac \\ a \cdot r_1 + a \cdot r_2 = -b }\] Now we have the form \[ \Large { \\ u\cdot v = ac \\ u + v = -b }\] So we see that if we can find two numbers that multiply to the product of the first and last number, a*c and add up to the middle number -b, we can factor the original quadratic.
that negative sign in front of the b is bugging me ...
That looks neat. Why does that negative sign bug you? Does it create any issues with the mathematical point of view? :O
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!