Power series question.
\[\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} (-1)^n*(2x)^{2n}\]In my book it says that we dan wrive this as \[\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_{k}x ^{k}\] with \[c_{k}= (-1)^{k/2}2^k\] if k is even. and\[c_{k}= 0\] if k is not even. Why can we set \[c_{k}\] equal to these values?
check your sigma please
wrive should be write.*
I figured, and k should be n, or the other way around
yes, the first sigma should be n=0 instead of k=0.
\(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \sum_{ n=0 }^{ \infty }\left[ (-1)^n\cdot (2x)^{2n}\right]}\) and you just need to covert this to a form of: \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \sum_{ n=0 }^{ \infty }\left[ c_n\cdot x^n\right]}\) ?
yes indeed, I need to the values for c_{k} to calculate the convergence radius. The values are given but I don't know how these were formed.
you just need a bunch of manipulations... \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \sum_{ n=0 }^{ \infty }\left[ (-1)^n\cdot (2x)^{2n}\right]}\) \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \sum_{ n=0 }^{ \infty }\left[ (-1)^n\cdot x^{2n}\cdot 2^{2n}\right]}\) \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \sum_{ n=0 }^{ \infty }\left[ (-1)^n\cdot x^{2n}\cdot 4^{n}\right]}\) \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \sum_{ n=0 }^{ \infty }\left[ (-4)^n\cdot x^{2n}\right]}\) or something like this....
but for the radius of convergence you can use the ratio test, without doing any conversions. Ratio test directly
Which course is this, calculus, right?
My native language is dutch so I'm not to sure what it is called in English but it's where you see all the things about convergence, divergence of series.
\(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left|\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right|}\)
this is the ratio test
Yes I know about that method, but I'm in a chapter explaining the use of the convergence radius. Which uses \[R = \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty}(c_{k}/c_{k+1})\] to find values for |x| that makes the serie convergent.
i think you are using the ratio test, but confusing something
and it is the a(n+1)/a(n) ...
Thats why I need to find the value for \[c_{k}\], which is given. But I don't know how to get these.
In your case, (if we use it directly from were you started) \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left|\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right|}\) \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left|\frac{(-1)^{n+1}(2x)^{2n+1}}{(-1)^{n}(2x)^{2n}}\right|}\) \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left|\frac{(-1)(-1)^{n}(2x)(2x)^{2n}}{(-1)^{n}(2x)^{2n}}\right|}\) \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left|\frac{(-1)\cancel{(-1)^{n}}(2x)\cancel{(2x)^{2n}}}{\cancel{(-1)^{n}}\cancel{(2x)^{2n}}}\right|}\) \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left|(-1)2x\right|}\) \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left|-2x\right|}\)
Now, for the series to covert, this limit of the ratio has to be less than 1
\(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left|-2x\right|}\) there is no variables here, (as we treat x as a constant in the limit) so this limit just equals.... \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left|-2x\right|=|-2x|}\) For series to converge this limit must be equal less than 1, therefore you set. \(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle\left|-2x\right|<1}\)
then solve for x.
The only thing to do, is that you would need to check for interval boundaries by plugging in the x value into the series and seeing if it converges or not.
The ratio test you give makes use of the d'Alembert test. This is without the convergence radius. As I'm now learning about the convergence radius I need to find these values for \[c_{k}\]. My equation was correct. So radius = \[= \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty}\left| C_{k}/C_{k+1} \right|\]
Then to see if it converges, I can easily find values for |x| so that |x| < Radius; and thus is convergent for these values |x|.
@SolomonZelman Thanks for the input but I have already seen this method and understand it. The only thing I can't figure out is how they got to these values for \[c_{k}\] I gave earlier.
Maybe you understand me better by reading this; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_series#Radius_of_convergence. This is the method I intend to use, as your see it says \[r^{-1}\], by making that r you get the equation I gave earlier.
but it is \(\displaystyle \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}\)
r^(-1)=...
So r gives \[c_{k}/c_{k+1}\]
yes, limit rules allow you \( {\rm r} =\displaystyle \frac{a_n}{a_{n+1}}\)
so you would have |1/(-2x)|=r
You're correct in all you are saying but it is not quiete the answer I'm looking for. I would like to know why \[c_{k}\] equals the formulas I gave earlier, both if k is even and if k is not even.
I believe that for odd k's you get an imaginary output (you would be getting some square root of -1, and that is \(i\) )
so they give you that this imaginary value isn't at all a value - that imaginary is zero. ((I can see this, if you look at imaginary numbers as at rotations))
I can see why it is zero for k = odd, it says the series will only have terms for k is even, so the coefficient should be zero. Still the formula for k is even is still bothering me.
So basically I found out that for the values of Ck they set n equal to k/2. Which is where these different powers come from. But I don't see why they would do this. If you substitute n back into k, it would give the same result. Why would they want to to change these powers (n=k/2) instead of simply leaving the original as it is and say n =k. @SolomonZelman
with (-1)^n you would only have positives for even n's. so they want alternative series for even n's. but I honestly don't know why they give you that \(c_k\) formula in the first place.
\(\large\color{black}{ \displaystyle \sum_{ n=1 }^{ \infty } \left[(-1)^n(2x)^{2n}\right]}\) negative for n=1, n=3, n=5, and for all odd n's positive for n=0, n=2, n=4 and for all even n's
I didn't, or don't usually see convergence using \(c_k\) ... ratio test is the most frequent and convenient to me thing..... sorry that i can't really help you more.
True, they eventually conclude the same thing but it is merely used to show the use of convergence radius. I understand it more or less now, thanks for the time spent helping me!
yeah, shortly: RADIUS OF CONVERGENCE 1) Ratio test, and set the value you get for limit less than 1 and solve for x. Why less than 1? Because we are taking it as a geometric series, and geometric series will converge when |common ratio| is less than 1. INTERVAL OF CONVERGENCE 2) Then, the x solutions, say, you got B>x>A have to be checked, by plugging in x=A and x+B into the series and seeing if it converges and solution includes this value, or with the plugged value series diverges and thus this value is excluded from the solution.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!