Question

Question about code cog Latex editor.
Is there a way to make a new line without losing the 'large' font. I wanted to copy paste from code cog. When I copy paste from it I get the following

Answer 1

\[\large (2,3)\to ({\color{Red} 2}\cdot 2, {\color{Red} 2}\cdot 3)=(4,6) \\ (-6,3) \to (2\cdot (-6), 2 \cdot 3)\]

Answer 2

@e.mccormick

Answer 3

http://prntscr.com/76yimp

Answer 4

it seems that i have to manually place a pair of braces around \Large { } , is that the only workaround

Answer 5

I believe so, or you could just do the \large code again, but I think it'll be more efficient to just use { }.

Answer 6

Yah, bloom has the right idea. Designate what you want as large using {}
```
\(\large{(2,3)\to ({\color{Red} 2}\cdot 2, {\color{Red} 2}\cdot 3)=(4,6) \\
(-6,3) \to (2\cdot (-6), 2 \cdot 3)}\)
```
\(\large{(2,3)\to ({\color{Red} 2}\cdot 2, {\color{Red} 2}\cdot 3)=(4,6) \\
(-6,3) \to (2\cdot (-6), 2 \cdot 3)}\)

Answer 7

@e.mccormick Is there anyway to get a smaller negative sign, a hyphen or maybe en-dash The negative sign above looks like a subtraction sign
$$\large{(2,3)\to ({\color{Red} 2}\cdot 2, {\color{Red} 2}\cdot 3)=(4,6) \\
(-6,3) \to (2\cdot (-6), 2 \cdot 3)}$$

$$ \Large 3 - (\color{red}{-}6)$$ I would prefer a smaller hyphen

Answer 8

ALso it would be nice if the codecog editor let you scroll down the preview window

Answer 9

it says equation is too long here http://prntscr.com/77curi

Answer 10

I'm not sure about that..

Answer 11

I know a way for you to make smaller dashes, though.

Answer 12

ok , smaller dash is good

Answer 13

\(\Large 3 - (\small\color{red}{-}\Large6)\) you could just change the size, like this:
`\(\Large 3-(\small\color{red}-\Large6)\)`

Answer 14

it's not the easiest thing, but it works.

Answer 15

thats interesting :)

Answer 16

do you know all of the sizes? they could be very useful.

Answer 17

for the most part, \large, \Large, \Huge, \small, etc

Answer 18

do you know them by heart?

Answer 19

$$ \tiny a \Tiny a \small a \normalsize a \large a \Large a \LARGE a \Huge a$$

Answer 20

no, but I was just about to get a table to put here.

Answer 21

sure you can do that

Answer 22

also as far as my question above about the negative sign, this sounds like a good
article
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/79141/is-there-a-designated-symbol-for-the-negative-sign-in-say-16
it seems like a workaround is to use \text{-}

Answer 23

$$\Large 3 - (\text{-}6)$$

Answer 24

Interesting. That's a lot easier than what I said.

Answer 25

this works regardless of the relative sizes

Answer 26

\(\Huge\tt\color{lime}{I~see~that...}\) \(\Huge6+\text-2\)

Answer 27

is there a way to prevent the latex code from going off the screen, besides for manually putting in new line. example:

\( \Large { V=\int_{1}^{1+h}\pi ( \frac{1}{y})^2 ~dy
=\int_{1}^{1+h} \frac{\pi}{y^2} ~dy
=\int_{1}^{1+h} {\pi}{y^{-2}} ~dy = [\pi \cdot \frac{y^{-1}}{-1}] _{1}^{1+h}
= -\pi h^{-1} - (-\pi \cdot 1 ) = \pi - \frac{\pi}{h} }\)

Answer 28

you can make it smaller... but if it's too small, it can be difficult to read.

Answer 29

From what I have seen, MathJax does not do automatic line wrapping.

Unicode U+2013 is the endash, so let's see... \(\unicode{x2013}\) ` \(\unicode{x2013}\)`

\(6+\unicode{x2013}2\)
\(\large 6+\unicode{x2013}2\)
\(\Large 6+\unicode{x2013}2\)
\(\LARGE 6+\unicode{x2013}2\)
\(\huge 6+\unicode{x2013}2\)
\(\Huge 6+\unicode{x2013}2\)