Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 7 Online
OpenStudy (unknownunknown):

I'm misunderstanding some elementary concept. Question 2 - http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-02sc-multivariable-calculus-fall-2010/1.-vectors-and-matrices/part-c-parametric-equations-for-curves/session-15-equations-of-lines/MIT18_02SC_pb_17_comb.pdf I'm failing to follow the reasoning where it says the line of intersection is perpendicular to both normals. Now, this seems to assume the coefficients of : (1,1,1) and (1,2,3) are both normals. However, I thought by the very definition of the dot product, two vectors are perpendicular (ie: one is normal) if and only if their

OpenStudy (unknownunknown):

dot product is 0. Clearly in this question the two dot products are not equal to 0, they are equal to 1 and 2 respectively. How then can we treat these two coefficient vectors as being normals when their respective dot products with <x,y,z> does not equal 0? I would like to both be shown where my reasoning is wrong and to also gain a full geometric visualization of what is happening here.

OpenStudy (triciaal):

sorry I am not good with these

OpenStudy (unknownunknown):

No problem, me neither unfortunately.

OpenStudy (triciaal):

@dan815 can you take this?

OpenStudy (rational):

you're confusing between "point" and "line" any line on a plane is perpendicular to its normal vector \(P_0\) is a point, not a line.

OpenStudy (unknownunknown):

So yes, say we pick a point on the line P0, that is located on both planes, this must be part of their line of intersection. But what I'm referring to is the dot product of <x,y,z> . < 1,1,1> = 1 and <x,y,z> . <1,2,3> = 2 If <1,2,3> were normal to <x,y,z> shouldn't the dot product be 0?

OpenStudy (rational):

you take dot product of normal with a line not with a point

OpenStudy (amilapsn):

Here <x,y,z> refer to the position vector of any point on the plane dr

OpenStudy (amilapsn):

If you take a vector parallel to the plane that would be normal with the normal...

OpenStudy (rational):

|dw:1432712103696:dw|

OpenStudy (rational):

aren't you trying to do \(\large P_0 \bullet \text{n}\)

OpenStudy (unknownunknown):

Ahh yes it seems so.

OpenStudy (rational):

which makes no sense, i hope you see it by now :)

OpenStudy (unknownunknown):

So the cross product then of two normals will give the perpendicular vector connecting them?

OpenStudy (rational):

cross product of the normals gives the "direction vector" of the required line

OpenStudy (rational):

just so you get some practice, try working another point on the intersection of given planes by setting \(z=1\) call that point \(P_1\) and take the dot product of \(\overline{P_0P_1}\) with any of the normals to the planes. you should get 0.

OpenStudy (unknownunknown):

Ahh yes, so say P1 = (1,-1,1). PoP1 = <1,-2,1> . <1,1,1> or <1,-2,1> . <1,2,3> = 0

OpenStudy (rational):

Excellent!

OpenStudy (unknownunknown):

Makes sense now, thanks for your help rational.

OpenStudy (rational):

yw!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!