guys! here is something. my friend asked me a question if we increased the length of an object by x how much its area has increased. so my answer was what kind of object it is. we need to know what kind of object we are dealing to know how much it is been scaled but my dear friend said no you know nothing about math lol so what do you guys say
area not volume
wouldn't the area increase by the same factor ?
suppose it is a line?
question would be invalid then, area for a line makes no sense
that's why i said determine what object
suppose it is a circle?
in the first dimension it could
circle becomes ellipse and increasing the major axis by "k" times increases the area by "k" too so we're fine
well that's why i asked we cannot generalize to any object
the way i see it, we can generalize... unless you have a counter example
what if it is an irregular polygon?
i guess i am confused as to what the "length" of a shape it, but maybe that is just my confusion
it doesn't matter how the shape looks
well like sat said...it depends on what length is for each shape...
i said any object and only scaling the length
well for regular gons scaling one side with some factor scales the area with the same factor
i mean not gons just rectangle, square....
by length your friend means that he is scaling in "one" dimension
yes one dimension scaling
imagine the object is in a paper and you "stretch" that paper horizontally by a factor of "k"
the area scales by a factor of "k" too, no matter how the shape looks
why did u friend say that you know know nothing about math if you are right then? :P
hmm seems that way! how can we justify the general idea
well i didn't really give him an answer, i just said what kind of object are you trying to scale so i know how to answer you
but he refused and said the object matters not heheh
feel dumb now lol
I am dumb
Noway! you are a mathematician, can't be dumb haha
at any rate, i think my friend and i had ego clash
@ganeshie8 can't see how we can generalize with any object? first we need to pin point what does length mean for any object
This is not a proof, just trying to convince myself more consider below shape |dw:1432872302786:dw| stretch it horizontally by a factor of 2 |dw:1432872323889:dw|
The claim is that the red closed shape takes twice the area of black shape
hmm i'm not really convinced there is a subtlety to how do you know it is scaled by the same factor
looks like a topology problem no?
familiar with jacobians ?
it is a simple change of variables problem : \[X = kx\\~\\Y=y\] find the jacobian
well the word is familiar to me but i don't remember how to do it anymore haha
jacobian gives you the scale factor for areas between the two coordinate systems which is exactly what we need
hmm i see
\[J =\begin{vmatrix} X_x&X_y\\Y_x&Y_y\end{vmatrix} = \begin{vmatrix}k&0\\0&1\end{vmatrix} = k\] therefore \[dXdY = k\,dxdy\] area scales by a factor of "k" when you scale the shape in one dimension by a factor of k
Fair enough
thanks a lot!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!