Can someone please explain the solution of the following limit to me? I'd really appreciate it!
Well first to check if the limit exist we plug in -1
Here we get 0/0 form so we try to factorize the denominator and see if any cancellation is possible with numerator. In this case while factoring we got an (X+1) in denominator that we could cancel out in numerator.
Right, I understand everything until it brings out a 3/2 from the limit
You can see that once cancellation is done after factorizing the limits tends to a value.
3/2? I am getting 1/4
\[\dfrac{1}{(-1)(2)(-2)}\]
Yeah i mean here... \[\frac{ 3 }{ 2 } \lim _{x \rightarrow1}\frac{ x-1 }{ \left| x-1 \right| }\]
where does the 3/2 come from?
Is this the same question?
yeah, check the solution in the attachment
Ohh my bad wrong attachment haha wait a sec
I dont see 3/2
:|
in this one XD sorry lol
(x+2)/(x+1)=(1+2)/(1+1)=3/2
so why isn't x plugged in for the rest of the equation?
They split the limit as lim xto1 (x+2)/(x+1) times lim xto1 x-1/|x-1|
lim(g(x)f(x))=lim(g(x)) times lim(f(x)) Thats what they used
Get it?
Ohhh yeah now i get it
well done :)
but why? since there's an absolute value?
You see g(x)=lim xto1 (x+2)/(x+1) is a limit that exists but for f(x) we needed more work so we took out known limit outside and dealt with f(x).
Yeah absolute value means we need to observe the function under regions.
can't i just cancel out the two (x-1) ?
Nope.
and just get 3/2
|x-1|=x-1 when (x-1) >0 |x-1|=-(x-1) when (x-1)<0 This comes from definition of absolute value function. |x|=x when x>0 |x|=-x when x<0
So the limit f(x) shows two values in 2 regions.
So what if we find 3/2 and say that since its an absolute value function, its either 3/2 or -3/2 so the limit does not exist
Limit exists for absolute value function. The only magic is that it exhibits different limits in different regions.
That is why when we have absolute value function we give the answer in regions.
Mhmm i understand...
Im just thinking that I wouldn't have initially thought of approaching the problem like that (splitting it to 2 limits)
Notice that you could do the problem without splitting also. We do the same operation on f(x) with the g(x) part remaining a person with no specific role. So to make it more appealing we split the limit.
Properties like these are used by those who approach the problem rationally. It makes it more elegant.
Oh okay, that makes sense
you see at the end it breaks the lim into one with x -> 1+ and x->1- ? Would it be correct if i do that from the very start and compute those 2 limits separately?
That would eventually give me the same answer right?
Of course it would be right. The limit should be answered in intervals and it is in the hands of the student to decide when to split it to intervals either in the end or during the start.
You could do all these cases separately and evaluate it in your notebook to make it 100% clear.
That way you get more than one way to approach a problem.
Awesome! :D Thanks so much @AravindG !!! I bugged you a lot haha I'm sorry! :D
haha I like being bugged. It means the learner is a good student :)
Lol Thanks!! :D i appreciate it!
yw ;)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!